Recent content by chugot9218

Thanks Hal-Jordan, I especially like the opening paragraph: "Using money from George Soros and liberal foundations that totaled at least $196 million, radical activists finally succeeded in ramming through “net neutrality,” No bias at all there. Show me a CNN, WaPo, MSNBC, NYTimes article...

Because government has accountability to the people, private companies have accountability to shareholders. If we let corporations take over our water utilities, they have a responsibility to derive the maximum value from that system. They have no obligation to ensure things are safe, there...

Please explain how net neutrality as implemented by the Obama administration conflicts with the idea of a free and open internet, all you offered was hyperbole and innuendo. The "self-regulated" internet in the US is ranked 9th in average speed, must have been more of Obama wanting to lead from...

Also, why do these useless comments that provide no commentary other than to link to some obviously biased website continue to be featured comments.

It is important to note that it is the Republicans blatantly lying to the public, enough of this false equivalency. For gods sake they created a whole presidential convention around an intentionally misquoted sentence by Obama. Since "you can keep your doctor" is the obvious rebuttal here...

With so much fake news going around I thought I should provide some context to TheFederalist (per Wikipedia, just as, if not more valid than TheFederalist *snark off*): The Federalist was co-founded by Ben Domenech and Sean Davis; senior editors include David Harsanyi and Mollie...

I don't think anything I said could be construed as declaring they have no right to free speech, I simply pointed out why the companies were justified in removing them from their services. You didn't even try to address any of my points you just return to the same straw-man argument and attack...

Your point about religion not being inherent is moot as we recognize the religious as a different protected class, if the nazis want to establish themselves as a religion they have that right, it's pretty easy to establish a religion in the US. I'm sure there are plenty on the right who would...

Fair enough, though in this case I meant it more along the lines of uninformed as opposed to willfully ignorant.

Mainly because of an article that was interpreted as inciting violence, while also calling the woman killed in Charlottesville a "fat sl*t who assuredly had many abortions", sorry if that was loosely quoted I don't feel like reading that vile drivel again, feel free to refresh yourself as you...

I see no problem with that, almighty capitalism would take care of an ISP willing to exclude half or more of a customer base anyways. In many states you can fire or not hire based on political ideology.

You cannot deny service to a gay person for the same reason you cannot deny it to a black person or a woman, it is an inherent part of the person. Unless you want to argue racists are born that way, in which case you further validate the case for not discriminating against a person because they...

Test it out that way then, I think that because you have it set to run whether logged on or not it is running it as a service, you don't have to be at your desktop to be considered logged on, so you may not need that option.

How about if you clear your argument and just try Excel.exe, does it open an instance of Excel?

Make your target "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Office\Office14\EXCEL.EXE" And your argument should be C:\Users\Luke\Desktop\MainLinks.xlsm You will need to point it to the proper location of your EXCEL.EXE if it's not at that location, it will depend on your version of Office.