Recent content by FiveDogs

I used to run several computers and 4 IP cameras all wireless... Added 4 more wireless cams and the system started tanking. Too much wireless... You may want to evaluate your computer performance with the cameras shutdown, then bring them on one at a time while monitoring the network. You may...

Have you checked out ForceBindIP? https://r1ch.net/projects/forcebindip

This can be done in MS Excel using macros and the VisualBasic shell command. Excel also allows you to create or import the graphic and will execute timed updates of the spreadsheet. Very powerful tools. edit...

To the original poster, rnrmusic, sorry about taking your thread down a parallel data path... I encountered the exact same problem you have and spent several weeks working through the various options, trying not to spend too much while doing so. In your situation I believe you need a router to...

Wireshark is on a netbook that I can plug into any of the 3 routers; it was plugged into the 192.168.0.1 gateway router while logging the file transfers between 192.168.1.110 and 192.168.2.112. During the transfers Wireshark listed dozens of identical entries: Source 192.168.0.1 Destination...

I installed Microsoft Network Monitor 3.4 on 192.168.1.110 (P100-LAPTOP) and ran a series of requests between 1.110 and 2.206. Is there anything this program can do to help? 8246 9:05:20 PM 4/6/2016 1374.8251145 P100-LAPTOP 192.168.2.206 TCP TCP:Flags=......S., SrcPort=27607...

I have the impression we're investigating something new to the consumer market... If you don't mind, I'd like to dig a bit deeper and see what shows up. What tool will dissect the packet and show what's happening? I suspect Wireshark can't or you would have asked for that info.

I hooked up a netbook running Wireshark under XP and did a test. Enabled DHCP on 0.1 and had it assign 0.152 to the Wireshark netbook. Opened up the Network and Sharing center on the 1.110 computer and mapped the network: LAN1 devices only showed up. Went to Computer and mapped the 2.112...

Yes. The network backs up computers from both LANs to the NAS on LAN2 and can print from any computer to the printer on LAN1. The cameras are all on LAN2 and I can view/adjust settings from a netbook connected via wifi on LAN1. It's seamless... I can talk with every device on either LAN except...

I have a laptop with Wireshark on it; I'll plug that into the 192.168.0.1 router and see what it says. btw: pinging 192.168.0.20 from 192.168.1.110 shows a reply from 192.168.0.20 pinging 192.168.2.198 from 192.168.1.110 shows a reply from 192.168.2.198 tracert 192.168.2.198 shows...

It works just fine... There is no menu item on the C5 to disable NAT, only a "NAT Boost" feature which is disabled on all 3 units. And the firmware is stock; no-one has bothered to modify any open-source firmware to work with TP-Links' implementation of the Broadcom chip set. edit...

Hello; new guy here... I recently set up 2 home LANs in order to separate 8 cameras from the usual internet traffic. With my setup I can access all devices on one LAN from the other, wired and wireless, except the opposite LANs router, which I think can be fixed by reseting the devices. It's not...