Recent content by kaky

And that's why they argued with the power consumption, because they are still slower than Intel. Even after 3 years.

Well, 3rd gen ryzen still slower than Intel, 1700x was beating Removed out of 6900k in AMD CB benchmarks and blenders, with both know how the reality turned out. 2600x actually BEATS 8700k in CB multithreaded, so do not spread fake news how AMD scales badly there.

7820 x0 7900x 1779 vs 2218 8 vs 10 cores So in Intel case, adding 2 more cores nets you 439 points. Intel 28 core @ 5.ghz 7334 AMD 32 core @ 5.1ghz 7618 points. The difference is 284 for AMD while having the 0.1ghz advantage and 4 more cores. That's actually terribly slow and terrible...

that 32 core is pretty slow when compared clock to clock, as predicted, bottlenecked by the quad channel, numa and by the fabric they use to connect their CCX. The more CCXs they add, the bigger the penalty and bottleneck, especially thanks to slow L3 cache in heavily multithreaded tasks.