Recent content by MaGiC_MaN

It tells me that for TPC-C, Opteron going from 32-bit to 64-bit has little impact and that it has no hope of catching Woodcrest at 2S. I just found out more info to justify me saying you're a moron. System 1: 32-Bit Opteron system shown at Intels website is servicing 4 clients and 8...

Wow....you're so damn stubborn...read my post, it proves they are uneven testing environments buddy. @Itty: I can't see Conroe blowing anything but Smoke.

I should also point out this: Woodcrest System (from TPC here: http://www.tpc.org/tpcc/results/tpcc_result_detail.asp?id=106052202) Clients: 8 Threads: 4 Opteron System (from TPC here: http://www.tpc.org/tpcc/results/tpcc_result_detail.asp?id=106032001) Clients: 4 Threads: 16 It may be...

gOJDO.....you're......wow...no word to describe you.. Accord: Read my latest post, you ARE a moron, you can't even get the same set of data.

It tells me that for TPC-C, Opteron going from 32-bit to 64-bit has little impact and that it has no hope of catching Woodcrest at 2S. I just found out more info to justify me saying you're a moron. System 1: 32-Bit Opteron system shown at Intels website is servicing 4 clients and 8...

It tells me that for TPC-C, Opteron going from 32-bit to 64-bit has little impact and that it has no hope of catching Woodcrest at 2S. And it tells you that because you're a moron.

You're trying to compare SQL 2000 32-Bit to SQL 2005 64-Bit....this tells me that SQL 2005 is 10% faster than SQL 2000, nothing for the CPU's.

How about the fact both those systems have PC2700 RAM and using 4GB Modules, which means slower bandwidth and higher latencies.

Funny thing is all you Intel fanboys ganging up on me (remind us of the old days?) and it's when I'M RIGHT (still can't find a time when I wasn't though). I bet if Intel said publicly they were wrong, you still would think "it's an honest mistake" when saying "honest" and "Intel" in the same...

If you compare AMD's 64-Bit performance, it can gain avg. 40% in 64-bit over 32-bit, and that Woodcrest in 64-bit is 33% faster than the Opteron 32-bit, and it's a 64-bit w/ 64GB RAM vs. 32-bit w/ 32GB RAM, running a benchmark that increases score w/ more RAM. If you do simple math (you're all...

LOL, what adjust it by doubling its score? You are seriously grasping at straws.... Woap! You got me Itty, your genious never fails to impress!

The Opteron is 7% faster if they compare 64-bit to 64-bit from NGMA. Who's ass got kicked? Oh ya, your Intel Fanboy ass did. Not sure why you're all defending Intel so much, aren't you the same genious's who said "I'm a fan of performance"? So why the hostility when I prove Intel wrong? Isn't...

' I'm sorry you are stupid, but let me fix you. DL385 G1 - From Intel.com Intel linked to this website: http://www.tpc.org/tpcc/results/tpcc_result_detail.asp?id=106032001 Which is the SAME SYSTEM. So, what it is YOU who is the idiot, and I am not trolling Jake, I am saying facts. I know...

I give accordance to Mistakes, not Competance. Intel is incompetant and this proves it. Nobody is this stupid and cannot read X86 and puts down X64 and thinks it's a mistake, if they had read the entier documents that gave the numbers, or even looked 10" down on their screens and saw X86...

what would intel gain from that(falsifying a comparative test)???honestly? amd is going to be behind for a while magic.i think its just a typing error. You are truly an Intel Fanboy who is ignorant. Intel has plenty gain, such as market share! AMD is already ahead of NGMA and will never be...