Recent content by OllyR

I’m launching a petition for the 5 Stars! Join me in making our voices heard!:grinning: It just doesn’t seem fair to not give them to this one! The 9800X3D is the best processor on the market for gaming, while the 9950X3D is the best processor on the market for a mixed gaming/productivity. As...

Cheap thing with 1 year warranty?? It's an Asus ROG LOKI 1000 W 80+ Platinum, priced at $250 and with a 10-year warranty. More than acceptable.

The most relevant thing isn't whether DeepSeek has damaged or will damage NVIDIA in the future, but rather the fact that as soon as the news spread (and by the way, we already had information about DeepSeek in December, so well before), a small breeze was enough to make NVIDIA's stock collapse...

This Blackwell architecture is a joke. Last year, NVIDIA faced a series of issues on this architecture that delayed the launch after two years of R&D, they had to make significant last-minute changes to the chip, officially acknowledging it was their mistake. Also there were reports of...

From what I've read, they already know where to look... Singapore. The sudden spike in exports to Singapore is clearly visible in NVIDIA's financial reports. Do you think someone will do anything about this? Investigate more? No, they're already flooding the internet with articles to save...

Thanks for your report! That seems to me more or less what AMD said (+13% on 7B, +11% on 8B, +2% on 14B and -4% on 32B) obviously some figures may differ slightly depending on the configurations. Slightly faster than 4090 at the smaller models and slightly slower at the larger one.

You are right on this, but that's exactly the point. Just because NVIDIA says otherwise now, it doesn't mean that AMD was wrong to publish those data and knock them. What were they supposed to do, not publish anything at all? Perhaps their findings did strike a nerve with NVIDIA, and that's...

How do you mean 'it doesn't matter'? Are you saying that what AMD published is false just because now NVIDIA reports different data and claims it's false? Is what NVIDIA publishes considered an absolute truth? or worse it's not even important if it's true? And by the way, they only publish...

And how do you know that NVIDIA's numbers are the exact ones? As I wrote above, he doesn't even know what he's writing, just imagine if he could have done even a minimal critical analysis of what NVIDIA has published.

But if he can't even understand what he's looking at, how can he write a serious article? When have those numbers ever been indicated in the AMD graph... just so you know, 100% is considered the baseline, therefore, the numbers indicated by AMD are +13% and +34%. What on earth did he write...

No, I absolutely don't want to say you have done something wrong (sorry for my english...) I only would like to tell you to continue, as always, to give us consumers a right good way to compare these cards, because you know and in fact you remember also this in the article that with these...

considering these numbers of SPs, CUs RAM and Watts the performances, if leaks benchmarks will be confirmed are amazing!(y) This is a what a real improvement gen after gen is. Not double the SPs and watt (and maybe price...) for illude the masses that you have improved something. Also the node...

@JarredWaltonGPU this gpu round do the RIGHT thing for all the consumers. Leave out all the fakes garbages and marketing tricks and test what it matters for us, the native resolution performances and image quality, plain and simple. RT is now after some gpu generations a diffuse technology in...

At this point any possibility must be taken into consideration. Why it couldn't be that AMD sandboxed the launch of RDNA4? It seems so for sure. It could also be much better performing than expected. It would also make sense generation after generation that the 9070 could have similar...

exactly. And like I said consider also that they use for the first time GDDR7, as "a coincidence" around 30% more bandwidth available.