Recent content by plutarchheavensbee62

Oh I read the article. The writer needs to get a refund if they got a degree in journalism. It may be why they are writing for Toms Hardware though. 1 step above the onion for truth content. 1 step below the view.

I can tell you precisely how it generated this response. And if I got anything except mediocre journalism from Toms, I would be shocked. The person asked for deprecating thoughts to be generated. They continued to tailor it until it was a message they could exploit for views. AI probably...

Maybe instead of talking about all of the extra money they need to give they can start by giving the Chips act money that Intel was depending on in the first place instead of tying it up with oversight committees that are setting up obstacles for payment that have nothing to do with chip...

That is fundamentally false. Instead of making stuff up, why dont you actually look into it. They are in debt because they started building a new production site in Ohio that was supposed to be funded with the chip act money. In addition, they are making several enhancements to their Rio Rancho...

They wont qualify for the chips act money until they lay off a bunch of staff and hire a more diverse workforce. Its written right into one of the subcategories of requirements for the chips act money.

They haven't received a cent of chips act money yet. You should research what the hold up is.

They haven't received a cent of chips act money buddy

Well fancy that because Intel isn't interested in selling their fabs. Tomorrow the author should write "im not interested in selling my kidneys". Where do you find these writers. Toms is tantamount to the Onion with its absurdities.