Recent content by vertuallinsanity

Patents filed does not typically equal viable products or systems produced. It's a "fluff" figure.

Wow. This sounds... ...really fakeyish. ;)

Just...no! Extra steps.. Same as Intel, Someone is laughably trying to sew seeds of confusion. Neither company would muddle their nomenclature to create added work for their customer's understanding of process, nodes or fabs. Re-signing contracts involving additional internal and external...

Do you have a link to a different, perhaps non-spoofed page? Something smells phishy.. The typo belows doesn't happen much (or for long) on (properly editor-reviewed) published sites for .com based companies. From the 5.12.97 release notes: "• Background image will now display properly...

Recover failing fabs...check! First to market w 2 core types...check! Fastest stock clock speed...check! Sooooo disappointing thus far.

One or two.. Not ten. None, I surmise.

"Cobots".. I guess we're still working on getting the whole planet on the cob, then. Eh-corn? Good luck with that.. This is not a real story and Intel doesn't backslash their node names because... Logic! ;)

This! And it still works. Especially for large companies/corporations. Nvidia doesn't make them. They design them. TSMC currently builds them. Available parts could easily be established via warrant-provided info and/or cooperation from TSMC. TSMC: "Yep, that batch of 1000 AI units was...

He made the statement in Dubai. Dubai, UAE. Have you heard the details regarding "The Line"? To move there you need to give up access to a huge amount of personal data. Personal, private (used to be), data.. Which will, of course, only be used to improve the space. Complete B.S. Of...

So... Did he fully code his AI with AI? This is funny. In the real world... People are being advised to sell Nvidia at the high water mark.. lulz.

Is the article image an actual picture or a photoshop? The die doesn't look centered.

The story makes a lot of sense with Microsoft heading that direction. I suspect Intel would follow suit if they aren't already. Adding arm core(s) to an existing die complex would alow arm & x86 ISA on the same chip. Nvidia would be at a present disadvantage in anything other than ultra-low...

< Samsung produced the chips. The chips were sent to TSMC (currently). < MSI produces the board with memory and other components installed (typical for most video card manufacturers today). < MSI then sends the cards to TSMC for GPU packaging. "The oxide layer isn't a big issue since you...

Hey Mike.. You may want to fix the Model Specifications section of the spoofed page below. The scaling is incorrect for the scrolling list design on mobile and desktop browsers. Cheers! https://www.amd.com/en/processors/ryzen-threadripper-pro u mad bro?

Some clarification (I hope..) ° All the Nvidia chips in question were produced by Samsung which is based in S. Korea. ° Three of their eight plants are in China. Four in Korea. One in the US. ° The 4090 is currently packaged by TSMC. It is not packaged in China. ° Nvidia is shopping and...