I connected an uplink wire between my router (ASUS AC68U) and a TPLink SG1008D (unmanaged) switch. Both switches support 1Gbps (1000FD) speed but I'm only getting 100 Mbps (100FD). Why? Before you tell me the wire is the problem, let me explain some details of my network setup and some tests I did.
Router and switch are placed at different rooms at home. I have one network point in one room (where router is) and another network point in the other one (where TPLink is). Both router and TPlink are connected to their respective network points with CAT6 wire (straight). Finally, there is a wire (CAT5e) connecting the two network points (inside the walls at home, aprox. 50m long).
The scheme is:
Router Asus <--CAT6--> Network point #1 <-----CAT5e-----> Network Point #2 <--CAT6--> TPLink
If I use a network tester between two network points, all 4 pairs in RJ45 are ok, I mean, all 4 pairs (needed for 1 Gbps link) are Ok.
Another test: if I connect my laptop instead of TPLink switch, I got a 1 Gbps link (using the same network "circuit" I schemed). So it seems wiring is ok.
BUT if I connect TPLink switch (to network point #2), the link cannot autonegotiate to 1Gbps (so falls down to 100 Mbps speed).
Why?????
Last test I did was moving TPlink to the same room where I have Asus router and connect them directly with one wire, which worked ok (1 Gbps).
So it seems there may be some problem with CAT5e wire, but still cannot explain why the same wire works perfectly (1 Gbps) if I connect my laptop to it instead of TPLink switch (remember all equipment -router, tplink and laptop- is of course 1 Gbps). Apart that my tester said all 4-pairs are working.
Perhaps router and / or Tplink are checking impedances and are more sensitive than my laptop's NIC?
I also tried to force the router to go for 1 Gbps (with robocfg command). It didn't work (no link then). I cannot force Tplink since it's unmanaged :-/
Finally I'm thinking of buying a (cheap) managed TPLink (SG108E model - http://www.amazon.es/TL-SG108E-1000Mbps-Garant%C3%ADa-supervisi%C3%B3n-priorizaci%C3%B3n/dp/B00JKB63D8) and then forcing also switch interface to 1 Gbps.
Am I missing something? Any other ideas?
Hope you can help me. Seems like a good challenge.
Cheers.
Router and switch are placed at different rooms at home. I have one network point in one room (where router is) and another network point in the other one (where TPLink is). Both router and TPlink are connected to their respective network points with CAT6 wire (straight). Finally, there is a wire (CAT5e) connecting the two network points (inside the walls at home, aprox. 50m long).
The scheme is:
Router Asus <--CAT6--> Network point #1 <-----CAT5e-----> Network Point #2 <--CAT6--> TPLink
If I use a network tester between two network points, all 4 pairs in RJ45 are ok, I mean, all 4 pairs (needed for 1 Gbps link) are Ok.
Another test: if I connect my laptop instead of TPLink switch, I got a 1 Gbps link (using the same network "circuit" I schemed). So it seems wiring is ok.
BUT if I connect TPLink switch (to network point #2), the link cannot autonegotiate to 1Gbps (so falls down to 100 Mbps speed).
Why?????
Last test I did was moving TPlink to the same room where I have Asus router and connect them directly with one wire, which worked ok (1 Gbps).
So it seems there may be some problem with CAT5e wire, but still cannot explain why the same wire works perfectly (1 Gbps) if I connect my laptop to it instead of TPLink switch (remember all equipment -router, tplink and laptop- is of course 1 Gbps). Apart that my tester said all 4-pairs are working.
Perhaps router and / or Tplink are checking impedances and are more sensitive than my laptop's NIC?
I also tried to force the router to go for 1 Gbps (with robocfg command). It didn't work (no link then). I cannot force Tplink since it's unmanaged :-/
Finally I'm thinking of buying a (cheap) managed TPLink (SG108E model - http://www.amazon.es/TL-SG108E-1000Mbps-Garant%C3%ADa-supervisi%C3%B3n-priorizaci%C3%B3n/dp/B00JKB63D8) and then forcing also switch interface to 1 Gbps.
Am I missing something? Any other ideas?
Hope you can help me. Seems like a good challenge.
Cheers.