julienruc Honorable Aug 8, 2018 1,672 77 13,540 Jan 11, 2021 #1 Hi all, Title says it all, I am building a 1080p video editing PC for my friend and within his budget, these are the two options I've found. Are the extra 2 cores from the 1600 AF better than Zen 2?
Hi all, Title says it all, I am building a 1080p video editing PC for my friend and within his budget, these are the two options I've found. Are the extra 2 cores from the 1600 AF better than Zen 2?
Solution logainofhades Jan 11, 2021 I would say the extra cores would be better, in your case. The R3 3100's latency I think gets in the way. https://www.gamersnexus.net/hwreviews/3581-amd-ryzen-3-3300x-cpu-review-vs-3100-clock-for-clock
I would say the extra cores would be better, in your case. The R3 3100's latency I think gets in the way. https://www.gamersnexus.net/hwreviews/3581-amd-ryzen-3-3300x-cpu-review-vs-3100-clock-for-clock
logainofhades Titan Moderator Apr 27, 2009 37,549 3,218 143,290 Jan 11, 2021 Solution #2 I would say the extra cores would be better, in your case. The R3 3100's latency I think gets in the way. https://www.gamersnexus.net/hwreviews/3581-amd-ryzen-3-3300x-cpu-review-vs-3100-clock-for-clock Upvote 0 Downvote Solution
I would say the extra cores would be better, in your case. The R3 3100's latency I think gets in the way. https://www.gamersnexus.net/hwreviews/3581-amd-ryzen-3-3300x-cpu-review-vs-3100-clock-for-clock