I just bought the 172x and find it to be excellent (except for one negligible dead pixel off to the side). What's strange is that I got the impression that Tom's Hardware was really disappointed with the gaming side of things and chose the Benq FP767-12 over it??? When I checked Maximum PC Magazine (which I think is pretty reputable too) it failed the Benq on the tests they did and praised the 172x. Why is there so many mixed opinions about this particular LCD? Some web sites say yes to gaming some say no due to ghosting...etc. I think this LCD is excellent and want to know why it's not seen as excellent across the board by everybody. I'm beginning to doubt and wonder if I should return it for a Viewsonic VP171b or an NEC 1760NX or the Planar 1700(since I can't find the Prophetview 920 DVI anywhere!) Actually THG confused me more than helped me on deciding which LCD to get but I bought the 172x anyway to test out (I can return it in 14 days if I don't like it) and what I've seen so far is good (including Halo and Counter Strike). There was hardly any ghosting. What did THG do to make the games they tested ghost so bad? Movies aren't that great on it but then again I have a TV and DVD player to watch movies on. What do you all think?
