[SOLVED] 240Hz monitor - worth it?

[Gintama69]

Hi I have 27" Samsung CHG70 QLED atm(1440p, 144Hz, 1ms) but thinking of buying 24"(24.5" or 23.8") 240Hz monitor as 2nd monitor for CoD MP.. is worth it?

I think most pros use 24" 1080p 240Hz over 27+" 1440+p 144Hz for shooter.. but not sure if it's for smaller screen/res(less eye movement = faster eye movement = faster reaction) or for 240Hz(or both).
Also do you think it'll make noticeable difference to average player like me?

If I end up getting 24" 240Hz, what should be my average fps on CoD? I'm happy to reduce the quality for best result.

I have i9 9900KS and RTX2080Ti and my average fps in CoD MP: (checked with MSI Afterburner + Rivatuner Statistics Server)
1440p max with ray tracing = 130fps (after 1 MP match, small map)
1440p max without ray tracing = 146fps (after 5 consecutive MP match)
1080p max without ray tracing = 176fps (after 3 consecutive MP match)
So atm I run 1440p max without ray tracing for average 146fps since my monitor is 144Hz, but if I get 1080p 240Hz monitor then will I need average 240fps for best result?

Thank you.

 

[DSzymborski]

I can't imagine the difference will be useful for a non-elite player.

 

[LordVile]

Hi I have 27" Samsung CHG70 QLED atm(1440p, 144Hz, 1ms) but thinking of buying 24"(24.5" or 23.8") 240Hz monitor as 2nd monitor for CoD MP.. is worth it?

I think most pros use 24" 1080p 240Hz over 27+" 1440+p 144Hz for shooter.. but not sure if it's for smaller screen/res(less eye movement = faster eye movement = faster reaction) or for 240Hz(or both).
Also do you think it'll make noticeable difference to average player like me?

If I end up getting 24" 240Hz, what should be my average fps on CoD? I'm happy to reduce the quality for best result.

I have i9 9900KS and RTX2080Ti and my average fps in CoD MP: (checked with MSI Afterburner + Rivatuner Statistics Server)
1440p max with ray tracing = 130fps (after 1 MP match, small map)
1440p max without ray tracing = 146fps (after 5 consecutive MP match)
1080p max without ray tracing = 176fps (after 3 consecutive MP match)
So atm I run 1440p max without ray tracing for average 146fps since my monitor is 144Hz, but if I get 1080p 240Hz monitor then will I need average 240fps for best result?

Thank you.

240 vs 144 is questionable at the best of times and you’re only hitting 30fps more than 144hz, you could turn your settings down but 240hz panels aren’t all crap TN models. I’d stick with a good VA 1440p tbh