utgotye :
I can understand the 295x2...sort of, but there's simply ZERO reason for buying an FX 9XXX.
It's already overclocked and I don't have to deal with it... Mainly. Plus I can get it for the same price as an 8350. So I figure.. why not?
Why? Is there a specific reason I shouldn't?
Honestly.... I'd prefer to build an Intel/Nvidia rig (Simply because of the 64gb Motherboards etc, and the faster single core), But I am not about to pay 4x the amount for Intel for the same performance i'd get from AMD for a quarter of the price. Plus AMD last longer, and is far more reliable then Intel. Even though it's a bit slower.
Don't get it twisted, I'm not an AMD fan boy and I've owned and built both Intel and AMD in the past., and in my experience the Intel rigs always die years before the AMD ones, and generally have to be upgraded much sooner then the AMD ones as well, and are as I stated about 3-4 times more expensive for the same quality.
Hence why I chose AMD for this build, that and the future of gaming is moving toward a chips ability to multitask and mutithread, and that is the one area that AMD outshines Intel and always has performance wise.
So basically, I am attempting to future proof this build for the next 3-6 years, and AMD has a track record for Future proofing builds in that range, my current (AMD) rig is still running strong after 7 years with a 7770 (and a Phenom 2 965 Black) and runs anything I throw at it decently. My Intel rig died 3 years ago and I built it the same time as this AMD one and of the same quality.
So I figure this time instead of building 2 mid range comps, I'd just go with AMD and build a High end one.