3.6ghz E5300 with gts 250?

BruceOTB

Distinguished
Mar 5, 2009
318
0
18,780
Is this a balanced combination? or is there some bottleneck? i game at 1440x900.


p.s./o.t. whats a microcenter? ive been reading in the cpu section and i find posts there that "if you live near a microcenter, get a 1366 platform as it is cheaper there"
 

BruceOTB

Distinguished
Mar 5, 2009
318
0
18,780
thanks for the reply. i use a 512mb version of the gts250, and i have an option to trade it for a 1gb version + $10. what you think, trade(and spend a little) or not? What game would take advantage of the 1gb vram in my resolution? GTA4? my processor might be inadequate though..
 

darkvine

Distinguished
Jun 18, 2009
363
0
18,810
there really is no optimal level, it is just whatever you happen to like, though I personally leave it at the lowest so I get a bit of the affect without messing up frames.

The optimal level, I guess you could say, is the highest you can go with not getting lag, but I personally just leave it on low unless I have more then enough power to run it flat out.
 

BruceOTB

Distinguished
Mar 5, 2009
318
0
18,780
Can it run crysis? haha!

seriously though, what settings in crysis would you guys recommend me with this hardware and at this resolution?

if there's only 1 to choose, crysis or crysis warhead? what plays better?
 
If i had to choose 1 I would say warhead plays better, then that's just personal opinion but for what its worth it just seemed smoother and the game play seemed to flow a bit better for me. It is quite a short game though so you have to keep that in mind as well. I don't know if it is a different length to Crysis but it seemed like it to me.
The games do a pretty decent job of scanning your system and selecting optimal settings for your hardware. What i would do is download Fraps which is a free download that puts a frame counter in teh corner of the screen. Run fraps with the game and let it select the settings and note your FPS. After that i would notch up the AA until the frame rate gets hit. Crysis and Warhead played best for me at around 35 FPS average. You will soon know if your settings are too high as the first big skirmish will slow things right down if you are trying to use too much AA.
I would guess it will set everything at High to start.

Mactronix
 

darkvine

Distinguished
Jun 18, 2009
363
0
18,810
Warhead does run a LOT smoother and easier while looking just as good if not better. Crysis is a piece of crap when it comes to coding and working correctly so it demands 3x more performance then what it actually delivers. As far as gameplay goes I like Warhead a bit more.

As for your settings on that hardware I think you can do high or maybe even very high with no filtering on Crysis. At that low res monitor it shouldn't be to demanding. I would say High would be the best bet though.