3200 90nm , clocking correctly...? YIKES!

dougyfresh

Distinguished
Jan 25, 2004
171
0
18,680
Okay, I have an A8V-SLI deluxe mobo and a A64 S939 3200+ (90nm). The 3200 90nm should be at a regular clock of 2.2 ghz. In windows system info, it reads a CPU clock of 2.01 ghz. I had a similar problem with my old socket 754 3400+, but when I got the A64 drivers off of the amd.com site, it fixed it. However, this time, they did not. Also, I bought this 90nm becuase I was intereseted in overclocking because it runs much cooler...but check this out:

In the bios, it is set to "auto" for everything. I went in the bios and tried setting up the frequencies manually. I put it on a 10x multiplier and the cpu's frequency to 220 mhz. However, when I do just that, when it boots, it screams "overclocking failed" in a girly voice [a good use of technology to get me mad ;) ] I left the voltages on auto. If it says overclocking failed...at the regular 220 x 10..2200 mhz speed, what the heck is going on? I was looking to overclock, not underclock. The windows cpu speed may be wrong, but I can't really check it in the bios. Anyone else have any ideas or similar problems?

-updated all drivers
 

dougyfresh

Distinguished
Jan 25, 2004
171
0
18,680
LMFAO

wow i suck :(

i had a 3400+ 754 and thought it was a 2.4, dudes i'm way off on everything! LOL!

who's dumb? DOUG'S DUMB!!!

<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by dougyfresh on 01/11/05 11:04 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
 

Lazerous

Distinguished
Jan 3, 2005
174
0
18,680
Dougy, at least you have future-ability in the 939 board. ;)

<font color=green>AMD 64 3700+
ASUS K8N-E Deluxe
CORSAIR XMS (1gb) PC-3200
Gigabyte GF 6800gt 256mb
Audigy 2 ZS
2_36.7gb Raptors/Raid 0
Tt 480 watt PSU</font color=green>
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by lazerous on 01/12/05 00:35 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
 

Crashman

Polypheme
Former Staff
The 90nm 3200+ would be 2.0GHz, the 130nm 3200+ would be 2.2GHz.

<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
 

pat

Expert
Why did you switch for less performance?? the 3400+ perform way better than the 3000+, 3200+ 939 and even better than the 3500+ 939...that wasnt a smart move, unless you needed PCIe right now...

-Always put the blame on you first, then on the hardware !!!
 

jammydodger

Distinguished
Sep 12, 2001
2,416
0
19,780
Socket 939 chips utilise dual channel memory, this give a slight performance boost. So AMD in it infinite wisdom give the socket 939 chips higher ratings than equally clocked socket754 chips.
(Even though the performance increase from dual channel is lower than what you would get from a 200Mhz speed increase).
 

jammydodger

Distinguished
Sep 12, 2001
2,416
0
19,780
Yeh any socket939 that has a PR rating lower than 3500+ is 90nm. Higher than 3500+ is can be 130nm or 90nm.
I dont know if the S754 CPU's are going to be just 130nm, they will prob move them to 90nm soon enough (its cheaper for AMD that way).