The i5 wins by quite a lot. If you are doing any heavy threaded workloads (encoding video etc) then the FX is a good choice but not the 9590, the 8320 is comparable to the i7 in SOME workloads.
9590 is fail in terms of price/performance ratio- as an AMD enthusiast I say just so you won't think I'm a Intel fanboy.
You could go for Xeon 1231 OR 1240 of you don't have H97 or Z97 platform. Very cheap... relatively speaking!
Sorry I'm not getting a new CPU. My friend keeps saying his 9590 is superior for gaming. my reply is that my CPU@ 4.5 is faster than Maxwell@stock (bar the new devil) and the only games that your cpu will excel mine is bf3/bf4.
i5. With the money spent on getting a 9590, you can easily get an i5 and a Z97 board (seeing as you'd have to spend a lot on a motherboard to even support the 9590).
The i5 wins by quite a lot. If you are doing any heavy threaded workloads (encoding video etc) then the FX is a good choice but not the 9590, the 8320 is comparable to the i7 in SOME workloads.
Yeah, he's just bought a new system for gaming and it has two 290xs and 9590, i kept trying to tell him to get a different CPU but he's so suborn and wants 8 cores thinking that's better. am i right it saying that CPU takes 220w to power?
Yeah, he's just bought a new system for gaming and it has two 290xs and 9590, i kept trying to tell him to get a different CPU but he's so suborn and wants 8 cores thinking that's better. am i right it saying that CPU takes 220w to power?
Unfortunately yes.
Jesus, two 290xs and a 9590... How does he keep that cool...
The 9590 is a horrible cpu for the money. For the price of that space heater, you could buy a 1230v3 and a motherboard, and have better performance. Sounds to me like your friend, no offense, has more money than smarts. They are overpaying for their system big time.
A Xeon 1230v3 (essentially a i7 3770, or i5 3570 with hyperthreading) will happily outperform a 9590. Costs far less too, and will have a much longer lifetime. Seems logainofhades beat me to it again. 😀
Most games won't use more than 4 cores/threads, so running 8 of them at 5 GHz is just a waste. A stock i5 would still outperform it in many an instance. Once OC'd to 4.5GHz, the 9590 won't match it in most tasks.
i've tried to convince him to chaange his CPU but he's a stubern fuck. so if he wants to piss his MUMS money up the wall cos he cba to get a job then w/e
btw will that cpu bottleneck two 290xs he's getting two of them crossfire
Smack his mom in the face. It sounds like the kid is way to spoiled for his own good. Regardless of the outcome, he's just going to be that entitled kid walking down the block expecting life to hand him everything. He's going to be worse off than "normal" people.
he wants all the parts to be from CCL cos he can't build computers and there's no way I'm building this for him just to play final fantasy 14 i wouldn't feel right knowing all the cash came from his mum.
Depends on the game. There are some games where the FX 9590 would have an advantage. If you compare the FX-8320 to the i5-3570K (very similar clock speeds) the 8320 is faster in heavily threaded applications (sometimes; naturally it depends on the specific application). The FX-9590 is the same as an 8320, just at 4.7-5GHz. So by that logic it would still be better in those same situations than an i5 3570k at 4.5GHz.
That said, in most games the 3570K is better as very few perform better on the FX eight-cores than on Intel i5/i7s... reason being that even though they use many threads, they still tend to load up the major components of the game's engine onto 1 or 2 cores, so single threaded performance still helps a lot.
So really it depends on the game. If you were to play something like World of Warcraft, your performance would be significantly higher than his. But if you played BF4, he might pull ahead by a few frames per second (though honestly in heavily threaded games it's hard to notice a difference since at that point the GPU matters more).
And it might slightly bottleneck crossfire 290X, but it should be fine. I know people playing with crossfire 280X on an FX-8350 @ 4.5-4.9GHz while being <75% CPU usage, so 290Xs should still run really well but they may not perform quite as well as they would with something like a 4930K.
I agree, i've told him this already he's probably already bought it by now tried to convince him for the past 3 days and he's had none of it ;/. apparently it's a "bragging rights" computer idk how he can brag, just makes him look like a dumb ass -.= but, I've been the best friend i can be in this situation o.0
He's a fanboy, a goddamn fanboy and you should bitch slap him for that!
Bragging rights, I'll give him bragging rights with a boot up his ass!
Anyone who bragged to me about buying that overpriced space heater of a CPU would get a boot to the teeth. This would be followed by some form of bestiality taking place....just a bad situation for everyone involved;(