3DMark2000 benchmarks

Status
Not open for further replies.

Flyboy

Distinguished
Dec 31, 2007
737
0
18,980
Hey I want to see how well my brothers new system compares..How about posting your 3DMark 2000 scores (w/ hardware too)
A7V,VisionTek GeForce 2GTS,256 PC133 SDRAM,Athlon Tb 1Ghz,SB LIVE!, 30.0Gb WD (ATA100), Detonator 3 drivers,DX8,WIN98SE, VIA 4in1 (v. 4.26 I believe)

SCORE: 7200

THanks!
 
Mine isn't that quick but here it is.
Celeron 566@884mhz
128mb pc100
Abit-BE6 II
Voodoo3 3000 16mb
Win98 2nd editon
Quantum10gb hdd 5600rpm

3dmark2000 16bit triple frame buffer PIII optimization
640x480 - 4128 3dmarks
800x600 - 3847 3dmarks
1024x768 - 3150 3dmarks

Going to be putting in a GEforce2MX in the morning so i'm curious to see how much it will pick up, and also my fcpga adaptor is crappy as hell. I can't even set the voltage higher than 1.75 so once I put in my ABIT slotket i'll have it running at 900+ mhz.
In Quake3,factory graphic setting when you install I get 83fps 640x480 ,76 800x600, 49 1024x768

In high quality i get, 640x480 77fps
800x600 63fps
1024x768 43
 
A7V with Duron 600 @ 950
GeForce 2GTS 64MB DDR
256 MB Crucial Ram
Maxtor HD ATA66
NVidia Drivers 6.49
DX 8
VIA 4.26
Windows Me
Default Benchmark ~6500

I think the differences between our scores are due to obviously the processor and all that extra cache. Also I think Windows Me is a little slower.
 
MY computer is REALLY messed up right now, as you can tell by the score:

Athlon 750 @ 1050
KA7-100
128MB SDRAM PC133
GeForce2 GTS 32MB DDR

Score (1024x768): 2913 HAHAHAHA LOL what a piece of crap

Oh well, I can't play any games right now , so I'm upgrading when the ABit or ASUS DDR motherboard's come out!
 
I wasn't quite satisfied with my results either.
SE440BX-2
PIII-800
512MB PC100
17 Gb IBM 7200 RPM
3dfx V5 5500 Agp
DX8
WIN 98SE

Final score 4183
I don't have the complete version, does your score come down since your not using the 2 image quality tests, and are you guys using the profesional version or the free one?
 
I am using the free one.

And BTW, your score is low due to the VooDoo card.
No offense, its just not as fast as the GeForce cards.
 
I used the FREE version. I'm not sure what you mean about the score coming down do to the image tests. I thought it ran through all 20 tests. Are there others that should be included?
 
Tbird 1.1Ghz / Asus A7V
256MB
ATI All-in-wonder Radeon, 32MB DDR
2x IBM 46.1GB drives in RAID 0 on Promise RAID controller
etc etc

3dmark, free download, default benchmark:
WinME
4807
downloading powerstrip, OC-ing my video RAM a bit by moving the slider 0.5 cm to the right from 166MHZ to 182MHZ
5250
(I never believed OCing *could* be so easy and painless:)

Win2k
4500 or so (don't remember exactly)

performs worse in Win2k, I guess because it wasn't tuned for gaming...

score is low for what my system can do, but that's because of video card - I wanted more features than pure raw performance
(people from same company with same config but GF2 Ultra got 9320 on their scores! :) :smile:
 
powerstrip makes it easy to OC it... but its up to you to make sure you cool it well etc...

I thought Geforce can be overclocked just by going into its software/driver settings?
 
Asus A7V w/ 1005a bios
Tbird 700@945 (9x105)
128meg PC100 CAS2 @ 133 Cas3
Asus V7700 Deluxe w/ det.6.31 core/mem 205/390

3dMark 640x480 16bit = 8390

"I yam what I yam!"
 
whew, I only get around 4200 in 640 x 480 and 3300 with default settings.
FIC AZ11
mushkin rev2 256mb
Diamond Viper 770 Ultra (remember when Diamond was good
IBM Deskstar 45GB 7200 (shouldn't matter)
1 GHz T-Bird
Win2K Pro SP1
DX8a
Detonator 6.50 (tried 7.17 but, it screws up in ACAD)

Now I don't have much in the settings dept on this board and I haven't even tried to OC besides the RAM settings at CAS2 which I don't believe is considered OC'n especially since it's Mushkin RAM. I was wondering how this compared to unOC'd systems.

<font color=white> This new forum still sucks </font color=white>
 
Iwas trying to compare my performance to other computers,but on Mad Onion's website it dosen't give you all the system specs or if it is overclocked etc.So i really have no real way to fully compare.all posts would be appreciated.
thanks in advance rick

asus P3V4x
P3 550e@814 1.75v 148fsb
Annihilator 2 32mb 235/370
128mb micron pc133 cas3 at 148fsb
10 gig Western Digital 7200 rpm udma66
Vortex 2
52x cdrom
Soho nic
Best Data 56k modem
floppy

http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare.shtml?1310492
6951 3D MARKS
1024x768 16bit

i had posted this under o/c 3dchips then i found it here,so i was lazy and did a copy paste.

<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Rick_Criswell on 02/26/01 11:36 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
 
Hey Flyboy, we can't help unless you tell the resolution you used, it makes a HUGE diff!

I'm assuming default bench?

Screw the risks! -Street
-AMD 1470Mhz-Abit KT7A-Raid-256Mushrev3-Fop38
 
I have both installed, and have been troubled with the rather "unstable" condition of Win2K. Athlon 1ghz/Asus A7V/512/ultradma100 working. I used the 3dmark2000 to do a system check and noticed that in Win2K it runs at the 5000 to 5100 and WinME runs at 7100 to 7300. I figure this is something to do with the VIAAGP.sys file. I need help on how to get Win2k stable <7 lock-ups a day is quite normal>.And maybe even get the AGP problems fixed up.
Any information would be greatly welcomed. It's a Geforce2 pro vid card


Menatour
 
Status
Not open for further replies.