I was looking at some of the CPU reviews in TH.com and noticed that the 4200 X2 Athalon performs just about as fast as the 4400 X2, and that the ghz clock rate appears to be the same for both chips.
However- the 4400 X2 comes with 1MB per core, and the 4200 only has 512k per core. Does this make a difference?
Right now the 4200 is more than $100 cheaper than the 4400. If I will not see or notice a huge difference I would like to spend that $100 on another component upgrade.
My question is should I get the 4400 X2 or the 4200 X2? Is there a difference in performance?
In some tests the 4200 performed better than the 4400...
WHich version X2 dual core should I buy?
I have a ASUS AN-8 SLI DELUXE mobo, and a Radeon X800 GTO video card, with two 250gig WD 7200 drives with 16mb cache.
Thanks for your help!
However- the 4400 X2 comes with 1MB per core, and the 4200 only has 512k per core. Does this make a difference?
Right now the 4200 is more than $100 cheaper than the 4400. If I will not see or notice a huge difference I would like to spend that $100 on another component upgrade.
My question is should I get the 4400 X2 or the 4200 X2? Is there a difference in performance?
In some tests the 4200 performed better than the 4400...
WHich version X2 dual core should I buy?
I have a ASUS AN-8 SLI DELUXE mobo, and a Radeon X800 GTO video card, with two 250gig WD 7200 drives with 16mb cache.
Thanks for your help!