4870x2 HardOCP Preview - taking the fluff out of reviewing t -.- t

ovaltineplease

Distinguished
May 9, 2008
1,198
0
19,280
Finally there is a review that will show what the r700 is capable of in a good light and a non cpu bottlenecked state.

http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MTUzMSwxLCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdA==

I direct you specifically to the 24xCSAA with ADAA enabled to show you what this card is truly capable of:

http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MTUzMSw4LCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdA==

Age of Conan 2560*1600, 8xADAA - 4870x2 Crossfired:

http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/image.html?image=MTIxNTk3NjMwNHdjT0psaWNvM3pfOF8xMF9sLnBuZw==
 

ausch30

Distinguished
Feb 9, 2007
2,210
0
19,790
Nice performance and with pre-release drivers so it should be very interesting soon. I am running a single 8800GT @ 1920x1200 and I can play all my games maxed except Crysis and still neither of these setups even SLI and Crossfire can do that so I think I might have to wait for the next generation to upgrade.
 

ovaltineplease

Distinguished
May 9, 2008
1,198
0
19,280
I have doubts that release drivers are going to catapult it any further than it is, but the performance is good to say the least. A release driver might bump up Crysis performance though, seeing as they are communicating through an onboard XF bridge.

On most dual gpu setups with mature drivers (AMD or Nvidia), the scaling for Crysis is about 50% of the framerate of a single gpu; so I would say there will be some improvement there.
 

ausch30

Distinguished
Feb 9, 2007
2,210
0
19,790

I don't think release drivers will make a night and day difference but they should certainly improve the scaling in Crysis where the performance of 2 cards was actually worse.
 

ovaltineplease

Distinguished
May 9, 2008
1,198
0
19,280



Yea, and you criticized me for calling a test on a 3.2 ghz cpu a fluff test

Now do you understand how much a higher clocked CPU can show the potential of a gpu?

Anyways..
 

ovaltineplease

Distinguished
May 9, 2008
1,198
0
19,280
Nah, by the time Nehalem is out we'll have a whole new suite of games to bench on...

Far Cry2 and Stalker : Clear Sky being the two most anticipated for next gen graphics.
 

ausch30

Distinguished
Feb 9, 2007
2,210
0
19,790

It was only at 3.6 though, I bet you can spend half the money on a Q9550 and get the same performance.
 
All the cpu "experts" criticised me for saying this a few months ago, that common cpus will bottleneck this gen of gfx cards, makes me wonder if they arent all caught up in a bunch of hype. Like more cores? Whats funny is, gpus are the parallel processors heheh
 

ovaltineplease

Distinguished
May 9, 2008
1,198
0
19,280



Or buy a C2D and clock it to 4.0ghz for even less for the same performance in these titles :p

But really, there is a pretty markable difference between 3.2 and 3.6 on a quad core as far as eliminating cpu issues goes, especially in titles like Crysis and AoC that will actually use the helper threads when possible~
 

ausch30

Distinguished
Feb 9, 2007
2,210
0
19,790

That's why I decided to go with the E8400 when everyone was saying Q6600. I'm going to build a new system when Nehalem comes out though, I don't think I'll be able to resist.
 

ovaltineplease

Distinguished
May 9, 2008
1,198
0
19,280



hehe, yea; I use an e8400 too, 4.05ghz

I think when Nehalem hits i'll drop in a last gen penryn quad core at that point, whatever is highest on the clock list with a locked multiplier; should be pretty cheap by then.

I think i'll wait to adopt Nehalem, prolly gonna be too expensive and I like to tweak for my dollar value :p
 

ausch30

Distinguished
Feb 9, 2007
2,210
0
19,790

What I do is have 2 windows open, 1 with the configuration menu and 1 on a thread I've posted on and after you save your changes reload the other one and look at your post. When you change anything it changes on all the posts you've done not just from that point on.
 

bdollar

Distinguished
Apr 18, 2008
520
0
18,980
4870x2 is 2 put together so crossfire is really 4 right? but compared to the 280 in sli so only 2 of them? i assume this is a price thing? because can't you sli 3 of the 280's? but i guess if you can get 4870x2 in crossfire for the price of 2 280's then it is a valid comparison. for people who are trying to eek out every bit of performance it would be interesting to see a comparison of the best available. so max 280's vs max 4870's. just a thought.
 

spathotan

Distinguished
Nov 16, 2007
2,390
0
19,780
Very nice performance with Age of Conan. My 4870 at 780/1065 gets about 55fps with all shadows on high, bloom, 8xMSAA, 16AF, all settings maxed on 1650 x 1080 in that same zone (Old Tarantia), 200+ indoors :D. I cant complain one bit. Although my Q6600 MIIIIIGHT be holding it back, its OC'ed to 3.0, Im gonna push it higher once I put my AC7 on it and ditch this faulty Xigmatek. Im idling at 50c right now...

The 4870 X2 was obviously built for max settings at extremely high resolutions, something nothing else on the market can do under $1000 basically. I say it wins despite the poor drivers, mass heat and ear drum blowing noise.
 

ausch30

Distinguished
Feb 9, 2007
2,210
0
19,790

You are correct it is 2 GPU's against 4 GPU's which is part of the reason for the poor scaling. 1 4870 is about 10-15% behind a GTX280 and you see that the X2 which is 2 GPU's doesn't produce double the performance. As the number of GPU's increase the performance gained decreases so don't expect 3x GTX280 to give 3x the performance.
 

TRENDING THREADS