BigBadBeef :
Okay then, lets do it your way:
FACT #1 - 4 power supplies dead across 2 computers;
A 'not working' PSU does not mean a dead (or defective) PSU. To be dead, an internal part must have failed. Normal is for a perfectly good supply to not work because, for example, a power controller does not let it work.
Please state why each 'not working' supply is defective. A 'not working' supply does not mean it is defective.
Unstable power is another subjective claim that is technically irrelevant. Unstable power can make incandescent bulbs dim and brighten often. Even that 'unstable' power is perfectly ideal for all power supplies. And does not cause PSU heating.
What can make a PSU hottest? Operating at only 50% power levels. That same supply is much cooler at near zero or near 100% power output. This contradicts popular urban myths. But that is how some supplies work.
If power is 'unstable', then the particular 'unstable' is defined. Most every condition called unstable never caused any power supply to get warmer or fail. I designed and built supplies even 40 years ago. And never saw 'unstable' power cause heating or failure. I have seen some 'unstables' cause a PSU to do a normal and not destructive power off.
I have done this stuff for a very long time. I see no reason to believe any 'not working' PSU is defective. I see no reasons to believe power is unstable. I see a popular urban myth that unstable power makes a supply hotter.
Unstable power is not +/-1 volt. Even +/-10 volts is perfectly stable power. The Asus surge has no relationship to AC power or a surge protector. These are also conclusions based only in observation and speculation. Not tempered by numerical facts. And due to what so many urban myths promote. You have no numeric facts that say you have unstable power or had an AC mains surge.
Even that 'superior capacitor fear is based mostly in myth. A so called low qualtiy cap might fail after 30 years. The better one might last 90. To a consumer, both are perfectly good.
Return to the acutal problem. You are conbining observation with speculation. A useful reply is always based in perspective and hard facts. That means numbers. 1) Incandescent bulb powered from the same receptacle provides a useful fact. 2) Voltage measurements using a meter on specific wires (as defined by requested instructions) will identify or exonerate many suspects. 3) A dead body is your best evidence. Autopsy:what inside each PSU failed. What results from any of those hard facts is, first, a reason for the failure. And second, a soution that actually fixes something.
No reason was provided to believe any of those supplies are defective. Just because you think a PSU is defective does not mean it failed. A defective power controller would also make multiple supplies work intermittently or "unstable". Did you replace the power controller? Did you even what a power controller is before automatically accusing the PSU using only observation?
Please understand that I am not criticizing you. Please do not take offense. Your logic is flawed due to conclusions based only in observation, without numbers, and by not knowing how the power 'system' works. A PSU is only one part of tha much larger 'system'. Provided were at least three ways to learn what exists before accusing anything.