Hello,
The screenshot shows the result after a few hours playing Civilisation VI. My 5900X has an undervolt using Curve Optimiser per-core, stock power limits, and no 'AutoOC' or additional frequency. I had to undervolt in order for the Vcore to stay under 1.5v as, for some reason, a few days ago it started wanting more (VID was always over 1.5v and Vcore always over 1.5v). I'm curious about the VID (why is the CPU requesting such high voltage when it's meant to be hardware locked?) and concerned about the SVI2 TFN reported figures - I don't have the image, but I had a 10 hour session and Vcore and SVI2 TFN both showed over 1.5v (1.53v), unlike the screenshot below where SVI2 TFN and Vcore don't match.
System specifications are in the screenshot.
What I've tried:
The screenshot shows the result after a few hours playing Civilisation VI. My 5900X has an undervolt using Curve Optimiser per-core, stock power limits, and no 'AutoOC' or additional frequency. I had to undervolt in order for the Vcore to stay under 1.5v as, for some reason, a few days ago it started wanting more (VID was always over 1.5v and Vcore always over 1.5v). I'm curious about the VID (why is the CPU requesting such high voltage when it's meant to be hardware locked?) and concerned about the SVI2 TFN reported figures - I don't have the image, but I had a 10 hour session and Vcore and SVI2 TFN both showed over 1.5v (1.53v), unlike the screenshot below where SVI2 TFN and Vcore don't match.
System specifications are in the screenshot.
What I've tried:
- Loading Optimised Defaults
- Disabling every single overclocking function I can find
- Run a 15 hour all-core stress test with an AVX2 load (I use AVX2 frequently) and the clocks averaged ~4.3 GHz and SVI2 TFN ~1.37v.
