660Ti or 7950 for Battlefield 3



Why is the Radeon crap? It performs exactly the same as the 660ti in BF3, and is better at non gaming operations (not that this thread is about anything but gaming).

Its ok to have an opinion, but don't call it crap for no reason.



And those benchmarks dont show nvidia as being superior, the 7970 and 680 are tied, the GHz 7970 takes the crown on 1080p and up. They seem to be equal to me.
 
Are there any other games you are interested in? If there are, look at different review sites and check the benchmarks for the 660 Ti and 7950. That could help with your decision. If BF3 is the only game you are going to play, go with 660 Ti.

EDIT: Look at mrc's post below 😀
 


Doesn't account for overclocking, which the 7950 is undeniably better at. Also 7950 has far superior OpenCL/Direct Compute which the entire industry is moving towards(not just games, things like Photoshop, etc. also), Nvidia's OpenCL sucks. Plus the 384-bit bandwidth and 3GB memory help for AA/AF, Multi monitors, high resolutions, and heavily moddable games such as Skyrim. AMD Scales better with CF also.

Plus the 7950 currently comes with 3 free games, compared to the 660Ti's 1.
 

well i hate amd anything cuz thay suck and im all intel and im with nvidia like my 2 evga 690 that i have in my gameing rig
 


Sure sounds like fanboyism....
 



Thing bout this is anytime someone says amd or nvidia sucks they get called a fanboy..Sad part is the person saying they are fanboys prob 1 them selfs..Nothing wrong with liking amd or nv or both. Some people just like 1 or the other. Hell personally i like nvidia i guess that makes me a fayboy to