I have been visiting Tom's for at least 4 years now but this is the first time I've felt it necessary to post here. I have now read three reviews of nVidia's new flagship card and see some large discrepencies between the reviews. Specifically, Tom's seems to think the card came straight from the heavens while Anand was moderately impressed with it and HardOCP basically said it sucked.
What I find odd is that all three indicate that they used basically the same methods (apps, games, benchmark utils, underlying hardware platform, etc) to review the card. How is it possible that the results were so different?
Agree? Disagree? Am I just a bit 'off'?? It just makes me think that nVidia paid someone a bit on the side or made some deal with the devil in an attempt to revive their existence in the graphic card market.
-Dusch
What I find odd is that all three indicate that they used basically the same methods (apps, games, benchmark utils, underlying hardware platform, etc) to review the card. How is it possible that the results were so different?
Agree? Disagree? Am I just a bit 'off'?? It just makes me think that nVidia paid someone a bit on the side or made some deal with the devil in an attempt to revive their existence in the graphic card market.
-Dusch