770 or 7970

tarch20

Honorable
Oct 9, 2012
51
0
10,630
hey, im just wondering which to go, i can get a preety nice 7970 for the same price as a cheap 770, so im just wondering which to go. also any who answer this can youn please give an argument or reaason with this as i dont want any bias statements
thanks
 
Solution
Even though the 7970 has higher bandwidth, the 770 beats it in almost every other way.
The 7970 released in the end of 2011, while the 770 came out this year(4-5 months).

Get a GTX 770.


The 770 is also just an overclocked 680 with a new cooler...
 




The HD 7970 beats the GTX 680 when both cards are overclocked to the max. The HD 770 is just a rebadge of the GTX 680. AKA it's the same card. And the GTX 680 was released very early in 2012 which coincidently is very near to the time that the HD 7970 was released. Not to mention the the HD 7970 can be bought for less than $300 brand new with 3 great games included. The GTX 770 is $400+ and you have to pay at least an extra $50 to get 4GB of RAM whereas the HD 7970 already comes with a respectable 3GB. The GTX 770 comes with Batman Arkham Origins for free which is awesome! But with all the money you could save by going with the HD 7970 you could get they game anyway if you wanted it. Also Nvidia has advance Physx which if you want awesome physx effects you have no other option. Personally, I would get the HD 7970 because of the price. If I wanted superb performance and price didn't matter too much I would go ahead and get a GTX 780.
 


Not true. The cheapest 770 you can find is barely under $400, and a very nice 7970 (Sapphire Dual-X OC) is $300 on sale BEFORE $20 MIR. No competition price/performance wise.
 


I'm not arguing from a what you or i can find it for standpoint (in which case, i agree with you), i'm just trying to stick with the question as the OP posed it.
 
770 for 3 reasons

1. yes a 7970 when overclocked catches a 770 but ya can overclock a 770 too and the 7970 doesn't catch up.

2. If, there's a 2nd card as an option, SLI works

3. Lightboost which almost completely eliminates motion blur on 120/144 Hz monitors. AMD doesn't have it
 


1. when both cards are overclocked to the max the HD 7970 wins. So you're wrong here.

2. I prefer SLI to crossfire and definitely recommend Nvidia for multiple gpu's.

3. Nvidia does offer a bunch of built in extras that AMD doesn't.
 


Yes, I agree with you. The OP stated they were the "same price". In that case, a 770 would be better.
 

Just to inform you, that site has higher prices than other popular online retailers. I posted the prices for the same model you provided.
770: http://pcpartpicker.com/part/galaxy-video-card-77xph6dv6kxz
7970: http://pcpartpicker.com/part/sapphire-video-card-100351vxsr
 


The Vapor-X cooler on the 7970 isn't necessary, and neither is the extra $100 for the Ghz edition. You can get a Dual-X OC and overclock to well above a Ghz edition card.
 


altough id love to buy the parts for those prices i live in australia so the postage costs a mint, thats the only reason im buying it from pc case gear
 

Oh, that would make a lot of sense.
Just for your reference, here is the 770 card with Australian prices: http://au.pcpartpicker.com/part/galaxy-video-card-77xph6dv6kxz
 


If both cards can only be found in the OP's country for around $400 and/or he plans to eventually go for a multi card configuration and wants advanced physx then the GTX 770 is the right choice. However if the HD 7970 can be found for $300 or less and he plans on sticking with a single card configuration and doesn't care about adaptive vsync and physx then the HD 7970 is the better choice largely due to the bargain that it is at that price.