G
Guest
Guest
I'm baffled.. I've read 6-7 reviews now, of the Radeon 8500 vs GF3 Ti500, and they all come up with different conclusions. Some show the 8500 taking the lead, others vice versa.
I'm buying a new card in a couple of days, and I'm faced with the choice of a Hercules GF3 Ti200 (my idea was to overclock it) and an ATI Radeon 8500. Same price, almost.
I will use it primarily for playing fps-games, and watching divx on my television.
I know the ATI-drivers are buggy, especially when used under winXP, but it's said that in a few weeks a new edition will be relased, which should fix the problems with XP, and further increase the performance.
I'm thinking, that in time when ATI has optimized their drivers completely, the 8500 will smoke the Ti500 in every way - do you think the same?
What should I buy for my AMD XP 1600, running winXP? (thinking about switching to win2000, solely because of driver-problems with the ATI).
I'm buying a new card in a couple of days, and I'm faced with the choice of a Hercules GF3 Ti200 (my idea was to overclock it) and an ATI Radeon 8500. Same price, almost.
I will use it primarily for playing fps-games, and watching divx on my television.
I know the ATI-drivers are buggy, especially when used under winXP, but it's said that in a few weeks a new edition will be relased, which should fix the problems with XP, and further increase the performance.
I'm thinking, that in time when ATI has optimized their drivers completely, the 8500 will smoke the Ti500 in every way - do you think the same?
What should I buy for my AMD XP 1600, running winXP? (thinking about switching to win2000, solely because of driver-problems with the ATI).