8800 gts 320 to a 9800gtx 512

soundefx

Distinguished
Jan 17, 2008
661
0
19,010
I wouldn't get anything in the 9000 series as they are a slight increase from the 8800 series. You will see an increase in performance, especially as you are using the older g92 320MB GTS, but to me it's not worth the price.

Your best bet is to wait until the new cards come out, that way all the better cards not will drop in price. There are also Ati cards that are around the same price and is better than the cards you listed. One of them being the 4770.
 

tastelikecrab

Distinguished
Jul 20, 2009
88
0
18,640
yeah the difference wont be big enough to justify buying a new card. if ur selling ur old card then u could go for it i guess... but u should put that down for a GTX 260 or a 275. they are pretty cheap tehse days.

here's one for $164... the 216 core version. there are some others on there for the same price but its the 192 core version which you should avoid.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814187074

gtx 260 216 is currently one of the best cards for the price


or get the HD 4870 ffor $149. but i'd pick the nvidia.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150394
 

Snowbum

Distinguished
Jul 3, 2009
134
0
18,690
Orly?

By the time the 9800gtx+ came out the 8800 gts320mb was an antique. I know this because I had one. Then upgraded to an 8800gt and I was happy with that for a long while until i recently put in sli.

http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=154&Itemid=1&limit=1&limitstart=9
That was the 640mb version benched, trust me the 320mb was less able.

No doubt in my mind that the 4870 or 260 would be superior to the 9800gtx+ but for the extra cash those cost upwards of $150ish....OP stated $100ish.


 

pauldh

Illustrious
I'm with Snowbum. The 9800GTX+ is far superior to the 320MB 8800GTS and is worth the upgrade if budget doesn't allow a GTX260 / HD 4870. At the right settings, you could easily see twice the performance going from your card to the 9800GTX+. If that's 25 vs 50 fps, at the settings you want to play at, that's huge. Just do your research and understand what to expect from the new card. What res are you gaming at? What games are you looking to play? FSAA important?

I don't like paying $90-100 for a refurb though when the GTS 250 has been around $100 new at times. Look for a new HD 4850 for about the same price new.



Edit, here's one example: 21 vs 79 FPS
http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/gaming-graphics-charts-2009/Fallout-3,1171.html

Likely 16x10 and above or 4xAA in a GPU intensive game and you'll see a huge difference. The GTS 320 is getting slaughtered at those settings:
http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/gaming-graphics-charts-2009/benchmarks,54.html
 

hundredislandsboy

Distinguished
The 9800 GTX+ would not be worth the upgrade, especially if you plan on eventually moving up to an 22 or 24 in monitor. I upgraded from the 8800 GTS 320MB to a 9800 GT but wasn't so I got the 8800 GTS 512MB, wasn't happy so I got the GTS 250, wasn't happy so I got the GTX 260 and finally happy!

Sell your 8800 GTS 320MB to a friend for around $50 or less, then add the cash to your budget and you'll have enough for the GTX 260.
 

Snowbum

Distinguished
Jul 3, 2009
134
0
18,690
@nutz, Nothing is wrong with that chart. The 8800gts tested only has 320mb @256-bit gddr3 of Vram. Any current game over 1280x1024 is pushing its limits.....

^you graphics card whore ;)
Prolly the best suggestion yet on this thread too.
 

camarillo2006

Distinguished
Mar 24, 2009
13
0
18,510
I was thinking the ati because im a amd fanboy but i was wondering if my cpu will be bottle necking performance i purchased a oem machine and it came with a intel conroe e2220 @ 2.20 ghz. also runig 4 gbs of corsair and a apevia 500 watt psu on a 32 bit system