Hello, my 8800 Ultra just died the other day and I'm temporarily running on an old 7600 GT. I have a 2 year old system consisting of core components which include an Intel quad Q6600 2.4 and 3 gigs of dual channel Corsair Dominator memory, WD sata drives(300GB for boot up and 500 GB storage), Enermax Galaxy 850W P/S, Creative Labs X-Fi pro card, Asus Commando board, Vista 32 Ultimate, Thermaltake Armor case-air cooled, Samsung 22'' LCD(1680x1050). My computer time is split between Photoshop and gaming.
Apperently PCI-E 2.0 cards are backwards compatable and since I only use one card, I have seen reports that say I will never reach the bandwidth, that I won't see an issue. I have been considering the GTX 295, but have neard some issues that it and Photoshop CS4 don't play well together. Thus leading me to the GTX285. I am considering getting a nice 26'' NEC Spectraview(1920x1200 high color gamut) for viewing my photo files while at the same time using the Samsung for the CS4 program/tools. But I would also be gaming on the Samsung@1680x1050(would turn off the NEC when not using Photoshop) as mentioned. On my PCI-E 1.0 Commando board, will I see a huge difference in performance just because of the couple generation gap the GTX 285 has over the 8800 Ultra, or am I likely not to see it due to the 1.0 spec on the MB? Also, if I just go the route of getting a new card, will that Enermax Galaxy 850w even cut it? I noticed the overall apm's is high, but each rail is like 17 amp, when all the new models are much higher? Does this matter? I can certainly get a new P/S like another Enermax or the highly rated Corsair HX-1000 if need be. Heck, if I have to, I can build an i7 system, but I'm trying to avoid it if I can right now. I am assuming that upcoming games like Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood, Ghostbusters, Battlestations: Pacific, ect should run fine on my current system running the resolution I am, provided I get a new card, BUT AGAIN.....I'm not sure and would like some input. Thanks.
Apperently PCI-E 2.0 cards are backwards compatable and since I only use one card, I have seen reports that say I will never reach the bandwidth, that I won't see an issue. I have been considering the GTX 295, but have neard some issues that it and Photoshop CS4 don't play well together. Thus leading me to the GTX285. I am considering getting a nice 26'' NEC Spectraview(1920x1200 high color gamut) for viewing my photo files while at the same time using the Samsung for the CS4 program/tools. But I would also be gaming on the Samsung@1680x1050(would turn off the NEC when not using Photoshop) as mentioned. On my PCI-E 1.0 Commando board, will I see a huge difference in performance just because of the couple generation gap the GTX 285 has over the 8800 Ultra, or am I likely not to see it due to the 1.0 spec on the MB? Also, if I just go the route of getting a new card, will that Enermax Galaxy 850w even cut it? I noticed the overall apm's is high, but each rail is like 17 amp, when all the new models are much higher? Does this matter? I can certainly get a new P/S like another Enermax or the highly rated Corsair HX-1000 if need be. Heck, if I have to, I can build an i7 system, but I'm trying to avoid it if I can right now. I am assuming that upcoming games like Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood, Ghostbusters, Battlestations: Pacific, ect should run fine on my current system running the resolution I am, provided I get a new card, BUT AGAIN.....I'm not sure and would like some input. Thanks.