90nm Athlon64 benchmarks at Anandtech

Spitfire_x86

Splendid
Jun 26, 2002
7,248
0
25,780
<A HREF="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2242" target="_new">CLick</A>

They managed to overclock 1.8 GHz 3000+ beyond 2.6 GHz. That's ~45% overclock!

------------
<A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A>

<A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig</A> & <A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/benchmark.html" target="_new">3DMark score</A>
 

raretech

Distinguished
Nov 21, 2003
482
0
18,780
I think it's about time to build a new system for my wife...

<i>Cigarettes - No cholesterol, high in fiber, low in fat, how could they not be good for you?</i>
 

trooper11

Distinguished
Feb 4, 2004
758
0
18,980
i found something pretty funy that they said there too. Anadtech stated taht they saw an average of a 3% increase clock for clock in performance.

I seem to remember someone here 'upset' that the performance boost some predicted wasnt there. Well here it is, like it matters much anyway, but the numbers dont lie.
 

Spitfire_x86

Splendid
Jun 26, 2002
7,248
0
25,780
Extra 9-10% clock speed will make S754 A64s faster than equal PR'ed S939 A64s

------------
<A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A>

<A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig</A> & <A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/benchmark.html" target="_new">3DMark score</A>
 

trooper11

Distinguished
Feb 4, 2004
758
0
18,980
i didnt say pr numbers did i?

i said clock to clock. 2ghz versus 2ghz, whihc is what they are talking about. so it does shwo 90nm chips are marginally faster then s754 130nm. thats indisputable.