9200 and 9200se

G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

9200 is faster

"blackgold" <blackgold@yippee.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:c4hddv$cgl$1@reader01.singnet.com.sg...
> Which is the better card. I thought is is the 9200se but friends say it is
> the 9200.
>
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

The SE version is inferior; it's clocked slower.

--
DaveW



"blackgold" <blackgold@yippee.com> wrote in message
news:c4hddv$cgl$1@reader01.singnet.com.sg...
> Which is the better card. I thought is is the 9200se but friends say it is
> the 9200.
>
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

Dont listen to DaveW - he's the NG's clueless troll. The 9200 IS faster, as
the 9200SE has a 64-bit memory interface, rather than a 128bit interface.
The clockspeeds are identical in both cards.


"DaveW" <none@zero.org> wrote in message
news:b52bc.154913$1p.1992149@attbi_s54...
> The SE version is inferior; it's clocked slower.
>
> --
> DaveW
>
>
>
> "blackgold" <blackgold@yippee.com> wrote in message
> news:c4hddv$cgl$1@reader01.singnet.com.sg...
> > Which is the better card. I thought is is the 9200se but friends say it
is
> > the 9200.
> >
> >
>
>
 

TRENDING THREADS