A64 0.13M Vs. 90nm

narcotic

Distinguished
Nov 30, 2004
1
0
18,510
0
what are the differences between the two? are there any benchmarks? (link), another q regarding the A64, what are the diff's between the newcastle and winchester cores, and which one is better?
thanks.
 

coylter

Distinguished
Sep 12, 2003
1,322
0
19,280
0
<A HREF="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/athlon64-90nm.html" target="_new">http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/athlon64-90nm.html</A>

basically 90nm>130nm

Signature (up to 200 characters). You may use <font color=blue><b>Markup</b></font color=blue> in your signature
 

RichPLS

Champion
Aug 24, 2004
15,886
0
50,780
0
or simply 40nm, lower power draw, and higher o/c potential.
<font color=red><pre>\\//__________________________________
And the sign says "You got to have a membership card to get inside" Huh
So I got me a pen and paper And I made up my own little sign</pre><p></font color=red>
 

TheRod

Distinguished
Aug 2, 2002
2,031
0
19,780
0
This question was answared so many time on this forums and in many 90nm A64 reviews.

I strongly recommends you reading the Tom's Hardware, Anand Tech and X-Bit Labs review of those CPU and you will get all the info you need.

You can do a search on this forum too.

The simple answer to your question is : Get the 90nm A64, it's better.

-
A7N8X / <font color=green><b>Sempron 2800+</b></font color=green> <- <i>Is this affecting my credibility?</i>
Kingston DDR333 2x256Megs
<font color=red>Radeon 8500 128Megs</font color=red> @ C:275/M:290 <- <i>It's enough for WoW!</i>
 

Ned_Flanders

Splendid
Jan 30, 2004
7,502
0
30,780
0
<A HREF="http://img129.exs.cx/img129/9900/THG.jpg" target="_new">http://img129.exs.cx/img129/9900/THG.jpg</A>

_______________________
<A HREF="http://www.moviewavs.com/MP3S/TV_Shows/Simpsons/flanderssong.mp3" target="_new">Audio Sig</A>
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY