Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.super-heroes (
More info?)
Bryan J. Maloney wrote:
> Wayne Shaw <shaw@caprica.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 23:06:20 GMT, Sea Wasp <seawasp@wizvax.net> wrote:
>>> Am I just missing something, or am I correct in noticing that there
>>>appears to be a large "gap" in the potential types of Supers you can
>>>get from the novas -- specifically, gadgeteers like Iron Man and
>>>Weapon-oriented types like Captain America and the original Thor?
>>
>> Since all Aberrants are essentially what other games would consider
>> mutants (or accidental scientific triggered mutants) not a huge
>> suprise.
>
> Captain America: Triggered by Super Soldier Serum.
And note that this fits with at least some of the official explanations of
the Marvel Universe: some humans were given the potential for
super-abilities by the Celestials, and that potential gets activated in
different ways. Those who wind up having it activated before birth and are
born with or grow into their powers are "mutants"; but there are others who
don't wind up having it activated until later on in life, such as
Spider-Man ... or Captain America. The reason why the "super soldier
serum" never enabled the mass-production of super-soldiers in the Marvel
Universe is that it only works on those who already have the potential.
Of course, this being comics and stretching over 40-odd years, Marvel has at
times contradicted this, and since it's an afterthought explanation in any
case, it sometimes doesn't fit things well. But it is one of the
"official" explanations that Marvel has offered at various points.
--
ZZzz |\ _,,,---,,_ Travis S. Casey <efindel@earthlink.net>
/,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ No one agrees with me. Not even me.
|,4- ) )-,_..;\ ( `'-'
'---''(_/--' `-'\_)