News Acer announces Nitro V 16, first AMD Ryzen 8040 series gaming laptop, just ahead of Intel’s Meteor Lake Launch

Status
Not open for further replies.
All I want is all laptops from 2024 and onwards to only use USB-C connectors and just ship a few adapters if needed. Including for power duty, as USB-4, as I understand it, can do up to 240W charging. That is more than enough for a friggen laptop.

On the more specific spec list: I'd like it if they all include a friggen MUX switch for the video outputs. That is such a basic thing to add on any gaming laptop with a discrete GPU that is embarrassing not seeing it in all mid and higher tier offerings. Then for them to populate the two RAM slots. I mean, come on. And I don't want the stupid RAM soldered onto the motherboard for the sake of it being slim. Add the stuppid extra mm or two and let the slots be there.

There may be a few more things I'd add, but those are the really basic things I really need to see in new laptops from 2024 onwards. There's absolutely no excuse.

Regards.
 

ManDaddio

Honorable
Oct 23, 2019
121
64
10,660
AMD Ryzen laptop chips with exception of the high end ones always seem to be a bottleneck to high end laptop GPUs. Heck maybe even midtier GPUs.
People don't seem to understand that low wattage chips can only do so much.
Of course I'm coming from a gaming perspective. Not school or Minecraft mindset.
And AMD igpus are blah no matter how people try to spin it.
 
I hope this never happens. I prefer thumb drives in USB-A form and there are too many accessory dongles in USB-A form. You need at least 1-2 USB-A ports for all laptops.
You get way more out of using a USB-C to USB-A (and other stuff) and USB-A to whatever else. Plus, it uses less space, so you can put more of them, in theory.

Regards.
 
You get way more out of using a USB-C to USB-A (and other stuff) and USB-A to whatever else. Plus, it uses less space, so you can put more of them, in theory.

Regards.

USB-C to A adapters don't always work because the USB 2.0 and USB 3.1 protocols are on different pins in a USB-C connector. Trust me, I know as I've bee in the field, trying to make adapters work trying to connect USB-C on my laptop to a USB-A 2.0 port on a device I was trying to update. I thought a straight USB-C cable on one end, to USB-A cable on the other would wor. It ruined my day.

Also, if a device has a USB-A dongle, you don't want to have that hanging off your laptop with an adapter.
 
Last edited:
USB-C to A adapters don't always work because the USB 2.0 and USB 3.1 protocols are on different pins in a USB-C connector. Trust me, I know as I've bee in the field, trying to make adapters work trying to connect USB-C on my laptop to a USB-A 2.0 port on a device I was trying to update. I thought a straight USB-C cable on one end, to USB-A cable on the other would wor. It ruined my day.

Also, if a device has a USB-A dongle, you don't want to have that hanging off your laptop with an adapter.
Fair. I didn't know even within USB adapters there were compatibility shenanigans. I can't say I'm surprised, but I didn't know.

As for the dongles. Well, I have to say is the lesser evil going forward when a lot of things are starting to use USB-C more and more. Specially now that USB-C allows you to use proper docks, so it wouldn't just "hang", but it is a secondary thing you'd need to carry around, like a power brick.

Regards.
 
AMD Ryzen laptop chips with exception of the high end ones always seem to be a bottleneck to high end laptop GPUs. Heck maybe even midtier GPUs.
People don't seem to understand that low wattage chips can only do so much.
Of course I'm coming from a gaming perspective. Not school or Minecraft mindset.
And AMD igpus are blah no matter how people try to spin it.
Do you have any references to backup your claims, or are they anecdotal experiences? Either way it would be interesting to me to get into the details off those claims.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.