Acer Intros B326HUL: 32-Inch WQHD Display

Status
Not open for further replies.

soldier44

Honorable
May 30, 2013
443
0
10,810
6
Uhm nice try Acer but for about $300 more you can have a 16:10 2560 x 1600 display like mine. I don't do 16:9 sorry. My next display is a 16:10 4K when they fall under $1500.
 

chicofehr

Distinguished
Jan 29, 2012
533
0
18,990
2
16:9 just sucks. I have 3x30 16:10 monitors and would never go back. Unfortunately, websites are not designed for widescreen and video editing is better with the menu bars visible on top and bottom with video on full screen. Any kind of production work, 16:10 is better and 4:3 is best for web and office documents.
 

laststop311

Distinguished
Nov 8, 2010
281
0
18,790
2
At this price you are better off gettin a 2560x1600 30 incher. You will spend a couple hundred more but it will be more useable. If they could get this one down to 600 I'd recommend it.
 

Tanquen

Distinguished
Oct 20, 2008
226
0
18,680
0
Yea, I had my two Dell U3011s a few years ago for around $900 each. Man I thought by now I’d be trying not to buy a 30” OLED for as much. I like 2560X1600 with 16:10 so much better for games and work. Movies are better on the 16:9 Kuro. With the Kuro I’m also waiting many years longer than I thought to upgrade.
 

trogdor796

Distinguished
Nov 26, 2009
998
0
19,160
63
Why would I buy this when I can get the Asus ROG Swift for $800?

The Asus has the same resolution, a better response time, 120/144hz instead of 60hz, 3D Vision Support, light boost equivalent, and G-Sync. All for $100 less.

What gives?
 

Mathew Reuther

Honorable
Aug 4, 2013
19
0
10,510
0
Why would I buy this when I can get the Asus ROG Swift for $800?
5 inches of diagonal? The ROG is a 27 inch monitor. So, yeah, pretty much no comparison to the much larger Acer panel this article refers to. Some people want gaming qualities and others want a large screen.
 

knowom

Distinguished
Jan 28, 2006
777
0
18,990
1
And Seiki has a 39inch 4K screen for $499. I can't wait until they incorporate HDMI 2.0 then I'll switch to 4K. Assuming they don't jack up the price.
That's way more reasonably priced at least and yet still overpriced.

I still don't know who is going to be willing to spend $899's for a 32-inch display with a 2560 x 1440 resolution aside from rich pricks and a handful of businesses that could really benefit from it. You could buy like what 5-6 1080p 32-inch displays at that price and get a hell of a lot more screen resolution real estate. Monitor makers must think consumers are completely stupid.
 

Lazze

Distinguished
May 18, 2006
7
0
18,510
0
Uhm nice try Acer but for about $300 more you can have a 16:10 2560 x 1600 display like mine. I don't do 16:9 sorry. My next display is a 16:10 4K when they fall under $1500.
Curious, what 2560x1600 display do u have? Here in Sweden, the DELL is more or less the only one available. And its EXPENSIVE, like 9000:- SEK(almost 1300 USD)

// Lazze
 

laststop311

Distinguished
Nov 8, 2010
281
0
18,790
2


Go on ebay and search for 30 in korean monitor. You can get 30" 2560x1600 monitors for 500-600 usd. You will sacrifice a lot of on screen controls, the number of inputs, ergonomic controls on the stand, calibration of the screen. But if all you want to use it for is casual stuff and gaming you rly dont need all the nice extras thats in the dell.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS