Acer Predator 15 Gaming Laptop First Look

Status
Not open for further replies.

mapesdhs

Distinguished
Jan 22, 2007
2,507
0
21,160
111
I recently bought an MSI gaming laptop (6700HQ, 970M); oddly, I've found my biggest gripes are to do with practicalities of how various keyboard keys are used, and the lack of customisation options, whereas the raw hw itself is great. Thus, I hope future laptop reviews don't focus too much on performance tests when for daily use I'd say other aspects may actually be more important to a general sense of being satisifed with a product.

EDIT (26/Jan/16): discovered I needed the latest SteelSeries software in order to be able to customise the keyboard (V3.6.3 minimum), so now it works ok, I've changed the keys which were bugging me. Still not quite as flexible as I'd like, but definitely better.
 

voodoochicken

Distinguished
Dec 11, 2009
39
0
18,540
1
My takeaway is that Gigabyte is a MUCH better value, especially for "gaming". And a v5 with Skylake is available that still retails less than the Acer.
 

mapesdhs

Distinguished
Jan 22, 2007
2,507
0
21,160
111
I had a close look at the Gigabyte products, came away unimpressed in the end, though one problem was that a particular model I had been considering just wasn't available anywhere. A manufacturer may have the ideal product, but if it's not available to buy, what's the point? For reference, I bought the MSI GE72 6QF Apache Pro, a customised build imported from a US supplier.

 

f-14

Distinguished
Apr 2, 2010
2,344
0
19,960
50
lol at asus for thinking they can get away with charging $2500 for 15.6” Color LCD IPS Monitor (1920x1080) screen
fire those marketing guys.
max price is based on screen size and performance 15" max price will be restricted to $1500 or under with 100% top of the line everything to go over that means the battery will never run out EVER like it's wirelessly attached to a nuclear power plant.
 
Honestly, Gigabyte gave me a bad impression with their laptops, I'll buy their mobos and graphics cards in a heart beat, but the first laptop I got from gigabyte (Q2532N) in 2012 wasn't that great. Drivers were not updated frequently at all, and only when absolutely necessary, and both chips hit 95C a ton of the time.
 

toddybody

Distinguished
Dec 13, 2010
1,201
1
19,960
240
2500...

NO desktop 980 GPU
NO 1440p display (IMO 2160p under 24" is a waste)
ACER build quality

...yeah, I'll take an MSI or ASUS laptop any day of the week over this.
 

Quixit

Reputable
Dec 22, 2014
1,359
0
5,960
275
Well, I've got to give Acer props for bringing this out. It's a hell of a lot more competitive than their older gaming models, it has an actual 980m and that optional extra cooling fan is an interesting touch. I'd be more likely to buy this than the current ASUS 15" gaming laptop with it's lower GPU and higher weight. I like the Alienware 15 more, but this is a lot better than their last generation and the price is fairly reasonable.
 

Argent Gold

Reputable
Sep 23, 2015
10
0
4,510
0
2500...

NO desktop 980 GPU
NO 1440p display (IMO 2160p under 24" is a waste)
ACER build quality

...yeah, I'll take an MSI or ASUS laptop any day of the week over this.
Nice specs, but that price... ouch!!! You can get a GS 60 for like $1K less. Thanks but no thanks Acer.
Thanks for the feedback everyone. It really helps! My full price analysis (including different configurations of the Predator 15 and the larger Predator 17) is going to be included in our full review.

Honestly though, I agree with you all in terms of price, but remember that $2500 is the price for the configuration we received. There are cheaper models of the Predator 15 retailing for closer to $2000, give or take $100. That isn't too bad, and you'd be hard pressed to find a laptop with a GTX 980M and a Skylake processor retailing for any less than that. I could name more than a handful. At the $2000 sweet spot, you'll be trading blows with every other laptop vendor at that price point, and I believe that a Predator 15 that better matched those specs would do well in this category. If Skylake isn't that important to you, you can definitely find something a lot cheaper than ~$2000 with a 980M.

As for build quality, I didn't expect much either. I've used laptops of all sorts, from desktop replacements to ultrabooks, and from all varieties of laptop brands. Acer's lower end laptops might not be up to par compared to other offerings, which is why I was surprised when I got to use the Predator. It's really good. It's even better than some Asus and MSI laptops I've played with.

As for a desktop 980, I'm afraid that you can't find one for around $2500. A barebones gaming laptop with a desktop 980 would cost at least a few hundred dollars more.

Once again, thanks for the input. It really helps!
-Alex
 

loki1944

Honorable
Oct 31, 2013
1,665
2
12,460
211
Not sure if optimus is still in full force, but that was definitely a deciding factor in me ditching gaming laptops for travel and building a mini-ITX last month; too many times when optimus didn't work right and games tried to use the integrated graphics; regardless of whether optimus was saying it was using the graphics card (EON 15S with GTX 880M, Alienware 14 with 765M). ITX has its drawbacks sure, but price isn't one of them compared to the $2700 I paid for my EON 15S in 2014; I spent $1366 on a mini-ITX build with an i5 4440/390X/16GB RAM/240GBSSD/3TB 7200RPM HDD/380T Case, EVGA 650GS PSU, AsRock H97 Motherboard, H60 AIO/Mechanical Keyboard/Windows 7 64bit. Display wise (for traveling) I can hook up to hotel TVs and it looks fine or use my 1080p/60hz mini-projector. Pretty much done with the laptop thing. The only way I'd even consider it would be if optimus went away completely and they allowed for easy upgrade of GPUs (probably a pipe dream I know).
 

FakeMikeNJ

Reputable
Jan 15, 2016
1
0
4,510
0
lol at asus for thinking they can get away with charging $2500 for 15.6” Color LCD IPS Monitor (1920x1080) screen
fire those marketing guys.
max price is based on screen size and performance 15" max price will be restricted to $1500 or under with 100% top of the line everything to go over that means the battery will never run out EVER like it's wirelessly attached to a nuclear power plant.

This is an Acer product. Not Asus.
 

Russell Elfenbein

Honorable
Dec 8, 2013
4
0
10,510
0
My Gigabyte P35X v3 has similar specs and was released over a year ago for a similar price and from the look of it, my P35x V3 is slimmer and lighter.

980M is dead now that VR is materialising and claiming that it wont do the job... I can't believe these slappers would release a "Cutting edge laptop" with a GPU that's a year old especially considering that a regular 980 has been released for laptops.

In addition to that, if any of you guys haven't owned a laptop with 3k or higher resolution, be prepared for windows to annoy the crap out of you. The OS can handle different text sizes etc, but many programs aren't made to adjust to the pixel density you will have... Tiny text or frames that have shrunk and dont show the text that has adapted.

To be honest, this article sounds more like a sales pitch than a critique.
 

mapesdhs

Distinguished
Jan 22, 2007
2,507
0
21,160
111
Heavens, I hadn't noticed this Acer was only a 15.6"... my MSI base spec was $1000 less for a 17.3", though that was for a 970M.


Alex writes:
> ... and you'd be hard pressed to find a laptop with a GTX 980M and a Skylake processor
> retailing for any less than that. ...

Not so, the 17.3" MSI GT72S 6QE, with the better 6820HK, 980M, etc., is only $2200.

Most of all though, have to say as an admin of 10 years in academia, I'd be put off by Acer's track record in their desktop line, which was kinda poor, or at least it was when I was an admin way back.


> As for a desktop 980, I'm afraid that you can't find one for around $2500. A barebones gaming
> laptop with a desktop 980 would cost at least a few hundred dollars more.

I had a look, and indeed, a 17.3" MSI GT72S 6QF with the same storage and RAM (but again the better 6820HK) is $3165.

Ian.

 

FakeMike

Reputable
Jan 18, 2016
2
0
4,510
0
Well, the price is twice the Lenovo in the article. And its clear you are not getting twice as good or powerful a laptop, maybe 30-40% better. But its understandable - not many people will splurge so much for a laptop.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY