Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (
More info?)
Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:
> I never suggested I was hurt.
Since you don't know my motivations, if you think I was being insulting,
then that must coming from your own perceptions.
> That is just another example of your assuming, you seem to need to
> assume a lot to make a point.
LOL! Like you assumed I was being "insulting" to my your point? Looks
like my point has made! ;-)
> If you were capable of posting without insulting others to make your
> point, you would.
Nope, I was wrong. Again it is your perception that I was being
"insulting."
> Your ego needs the boost of insulting others to help prove your point.
LOL! Telling the truth about you is hardly an ego boost to me.
> If you think your information can stand on its own, you should try it,
> otherwise continue to prop up your position with your insults.
Well it is standing on its own, since you have totally ignore it! But
those that don't have a reasonable argument need to try to divert others
from seeing that they don't have a reasonable argument.
> Can your data stand on its own? We may never know.
What "data" did I present? I just explained why your opinion about the
OP violated the EULA is irrelevant legally. Since MS has refused to
exercise its due diligence responsibility for protecting its
interpretation of its One Computer license term for over 13 years, that
is their choice, and the OP continue to use his copy of software as he
sees fit, as MS has basically legally abandoned its One Computer term.
If the aggreived party in a contract believes he/she/it has but
materially hurt by what they allege is a breech of contract, then it is
he/she/its responsibility to persue the matter prove their allegations
to a judge by the preponderance of the evidence. That is how contact
law works.
Your legally unsubstantiated opinion that the OP violated the EULA is
just Bullsh*t and totally meaningless in the contractual relationship
between the OP and MS.
> I never said you were not an individual, it is your character that is
> reflected in your need to insult.
LOL! It is your MicroBiased perception that I was trying to be
insulting, unfortunately for you, I was just trying to demonstrate your
MicroBias, which I believe I have done.
I explain my opinion, and you just ignore it and lamely try to divert
attention from it, by any means possible. Oh well, as usual, you are
true to your form. Maybe one day MS will provide you with a
semi-rational argument for why they have shirked their due diligence
responsibilities, but I doubt even their legal team has come up with
one.
> Good bye Kurt.
ROFL!
> Post back only to boost your ego.
IOW, your ego has been bruised enough, and you know you'd actually have
to try to come up with some rational argument for why your opinion that
the OP has violated the EULA has meaning, but there is no rational
argument for that, so you are running away, with your fingers in your
ears, while screaming "I can't hear you!" over and over and over again!
> "kurttrail" <dontemailme@anywhereintheknowuniverse.org> wrote in
> message news:%233dLblOrFHA.260@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>> Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:
>>> Perhaps the OP wanted an honest answer.
>>
>> LOL! Honest?! Like I've already said, you are not a judge, and
>> only a judge can tell the OP whether he is in violation of the
>> license. Your OPINION is worth squat. Only a judge's matters.
>>
>>> I never suggested I was a judge, but I understand you need to make
>>> it seem that way to support your anti Microsoft agenda.
>>
>> LOL. My agenda is pro-consumer, pro-individual, and pro-personal
>> privacy. It's not my fault that MS is anti-anything not
>> pro-corporation.
>>> As usual you are incapable of answering without insults.
>>
>> Truth hurts, and its not my fault you feel insulted by the truth.
>>
>>> Display of you normal character yet again.
>>
>> Yep. I am an individual that is willing to tell the truth according
>> to reality, and you are a comformist that spreads the FUD and legally
>> unsubstantiated nonsense of a convicted predatory monopoly.
>>
>> --
>> Peace!
>> Kurt
>> Self-anointed Moderator
>> microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
>>
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
>> "Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
>> "Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
You forgot to X-out my sig, Juppy! PSML!
--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram