I'm throwing together a PC, not sure which CPU would be faster. I'm debating between Athlon 3700+ San Diego, 1mb L2 cache or the Athlon 3800+ Venice, 512K L2 cache. I'm just not sure what would be the better overclocker and performer. I'm liking the 1mb cache and San Diego revision but the 3800+ is clocked a little higher stock speed.
Then again, I might go all-out and spend the extra bucks for the 4000+. I'm just trying to see if anyone has any opinions/experiences on these new revisions. One thing to note is that unless I change my mind I'll be using a very vanilla Foxconn or Gigabyte micro ATX m-board b/c it's a SFF PC...so I won't be able to overclock excessively.
Thankya
<b> Life is about gettin laid and getting paid...so hookers have it made </b><P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by purdude on 07/21/05 10:26 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
Then again, I might go all-out and spend the extra bucks for the 4000+. I'm just trying to see if anyone has any opinions/experiences on these new revisions. One thing to note is that unless I change my mind I'll be using a very vanilla Foxconn or Gigabyte micro ATX m-board b/c it's a SFF PC...so I won't be able to overclock excessively.
Thankya
<b> Life is about gettin laid and getting paid...so hookers have it made </b><P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by purdude on 07/21/05 10:26 PM.</EM></FONT></P>