After 10+ years my olfd 24 inch 1920/1200 monitor finally died, so I am now in the market for a new monitor.

notsoswift1

Distinguished
Oct 21, 2010
5
0
18,510
HI everyone,

So last night After 10+ years my old 24inch 1920/1200 monitor finally died, so I am now in the market for a new monitor.

I am torn between going 2K or 4K, and whether I should get a G SYNC capable monitor or not.
I do not want a 1080P as I have gotten use to the extra height of 1920/1200.

I primarily use my PC for internet browsing and game playing:
The games I play include: EVE online, Diablo III, Star-Craft 1 & II, CIVILIZATION IV & V, X-COM 2, etc..
I have generally played all these games at max settings with no issue, until now.
I realize I will probably have to upgrade my GPU in the near future, I am planing on a 1080 Ti, So I am not worried about that. I just need to find a good Monitor that will last a good log while that is some what future proof...Can you make a few suggestions for me?
I would prefer to keep the monitor below $800.00 US. and somewhere between 24 and 32 inches.
Can you make any recommendations and is G SYNC really worth the extra $200.00 per monitor?

PC spec: Motherboard: ASUS Z170 Deluxe

CPU: Intel Core i7-6700K 8M Skylake Quad-Core 4.0 GHz LGA 1151 91W BX80662I76700K Desktop Processor Intel HD Graphics 530 overclocked to 4.6GHz.

CPU Cooler: Corsair Hydro Series H100i GTX Extreme Performance Water / Liquid CPU Cooler. 240mm (CW-9060021-WW)

RAM: G.SKILL Ripjaws V Series 64GB (4 x 16GB) 288-Pin DDR4 SDRAM DDR4 3200 (PC4 25600) Intel Z170 Platform Desktop Memory Model F4-3200C16Q-64GVK

HD: SAMSUNG 850 EVO 2.5" 1TB SATA III 3-D Vertical Internal Solid State Drive (SSD) MZ-75E1T0B/AM

GPU: EVGA GeForce GTX 970 04G-P4-2978-KR 4GB FTW GAMING w/ACX 2.0, Silent Cooling Graphics Card

Power supply: EVGA SuperNOVA 1000 P2 220-P2-1000-XR 80+ PLATINUM 1000W Fully Modular EVGA ECO Mode Includes FREE Power On Self Tester Power Supply

 
Solution
Is there any real difference between it and the ROG SWIFT PG278QR.
Is the ISP version worth the extra $100.00?

There's not a huge difference but here's what you are going to get for that 100$ more. The IPS display provides much more vibrant colors and a larger viewing angle. It has built-in speakers and are useful as backup speakers. The biggest difference though is that it has a refresh rate of 165Hz compared to 144Hz of the non-IPS display. Not many cards can make use of that refresh rate but in the future, I am sure cards will have no problems reaching it. (people argue we can't see past a certain refresh rate). I would say it's a 100$ well spent.

mbilal2

Reputable
Jun 15, 2017
939
0
5,660
1440p is the way to go. Your graphics card is not capable to run games at insane fps on 2k resolution but a 1080 or a 1080Ti will be a perfect match. 27" is perfect and I find 24" too small and 32" too big. I am sure most people share the same view (unless it's an ultra wide monitor.)

Here's a list of 1440p 144Hz monitors.

https://pcpartpicker.com/products/monitor/#r=256001440&H=85,160&sort=price&page=1

I would recommend the Asus PG278Q with the IPS display. It's a beautiful monitor and is one of the best ones out there. I wouldn't recommend 4k monitors as most of the current graphics card can't handle that resolution on high refresh rates (unless you SLI and stuff). I would pick gaming in 2k over 4k on any other day.


Asus PG278Q IPS version: https://pcpartpicker.com/product/XvfmP6/asus-monitor-pg279q

non IPS version: https://pcpartpicker.com/product/cdcMnQ/asus-rog-swift-pg278qr-270-2560x1440-144hz-monitor-pg278qr

ACER Predator X34 Curved monitor: https://pcpartpicker.com/product/WDcMnQ/acer-monitor-umcx1aa002

G-Sync is recommended and most monitors are coming out with either one of the two Sync features. If you are on a really tight budget, then go for non G-Sync monitor. You might want to look into the AMD cards. You'll save a couple hundred dollars on the monitors with the same specs and get AMD's FreeSync.
 

notsoswift1

Distinguished
Oct 21, 2010
5
0
18,510



HI thanks for the info.
I agree a 34 inch is to big.
I am currently using a 34 inch 1080p tv as a temporary monitor. It is way to big. And a TV even as a temporary monitor sucks as all I see are huge pixels that hurt my eyes.

I loved my 24 inch monitor, so I could get use to a 27 inch. I don't think three more inches will be a bad thing.

The Asus PG278Q with the IPS display looks perfect! I realize I will need to upgrade to a 1080 or 1080Ti for optimal use of this monitor, but I was already going to do that, but I had not planed on my monitor deciding to die, so I will get a monitor first then the GPU.

Is there any real difference between it and the ROG SWIFT PG278QR.
Is the ISP version worth the extra $100.00?




 

mbilal2

Reputable
Jun 15, 2017
939
0
5,660
Is there any real difference between it and the ROG SWIFT PG278QR.
Is the ISP version worth the extra $100.00?

There's not a huge difference but here's what you are going to get for that 100$ more. The IPS display provides much more vibrant colors and a larger viewing angle. It has built-in speakers and are useful as backup speakers. The biggest difference though is that it has a refresh rate of 165Hz compared to 144Hz of the non-IPS display. Not many cards can make use of that refresh rate but in the future, I am sure cards will have no problems reaching it. (people argue we can't see past a certain refresh rate). I would say it's a 100$ well spent.
 
Solution

WKIRBY

Reputable
Oct 21, 2015
122
0
4,710
Im not sure if IPS is worth an extra 100. In my mind, you could even pick up 2 of the tn panels for that low price. I use two for gaming and Autocad work. The Stands on these are particularly well made and they are very adjustable. They work awesome. Benq also has a good line of monitors to look at but their Stands are lacking imho.
 

TRENDING THREADS