L laramsrule94 Distinguished Mar 12, 2010 12 0 18,510 Jan 11, 2013 #1 Would this CPU: AMD A8-5500 APU with Radeon HD Graphics, at 3.2ghz would be bottlenecking my EVGA Geforce GTX 660 2gb DDR5 GPU? Im playing wow and getting like 60=70 frames in some places. and certain games feel sluggish. On Windows 8 btw
Would this CPU: AMD A8-5500 APU with Radeon HD Graphics, at 3.2ghz would be bottlenecking my EVGA Geforce GTX 660 2gb DDR5 GPU? Im playing wow and getting like 60=70 frames in some places. and certain games feel sluggish. On Windows 8 btw
ASHISH65 Splendid Oct 15, 2012 5,964 0 27,310 Jan 11, 2013 #2 No there is no bottleneck.do not worry. Upvote 0 Downvote
L laramsrule94 Distinguished Mar 12, 2010 12 0 18,510 Jan 11, 2013 #3 Ok, is it just the GPU isnt all I thought it would be :l I can play bf3 pretty easily on lowish settings with good frames, and WoWs like 6 years old.. Upvote 0 Downvote
Ok, is it just the GPU isnt all I thought it would be :l I can play bf3 pretty easily on lowish settings with good frames, and WoWs like 6 years old..
satyamdubey Distinguished Jun 19, 2012 1,345 2 19,665 Jan 11, 2013 #4 if you are not maxing out your gpu, yet your cpu is being fully utilized then yes your are being bottlenecked. GTX 660 is a great GPU and you should be able to play BF3 at ultra preset @ 1080p: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-660-geforce-gtx-650-benchmark,3297-7.html Upvote 0 Downvote
if you are not maxing out your gpu, yet your cpu is being fully utilized then yes your are being bottlenecked. GTX 660 is a great GPU and you should be able to play BF3 at ultra preset @ 1080p: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-660-geforce-gtx-650-benchmark,3297-7.html
amuffin Illustrious Jul 29, 2011 14,977 1 41,960 Jan 11, 2013 #5 Simply because BF3 and WoW are more CPU dependent than GPU dependent. Upvote 0 Downvote
D darth pravus Honorable Nov 9, 2012 1,552 0 11,960 Jan 11, 2013 #6 Your CPU needs a big overclock or replacing. WOW is heavily intel biased. Upvote 0 Downvote
satyamdubey Distinguished Jun 19, 2012 1,345 2 19,665 Jan 11, 2013 #7 amuffin : Simply because BF3 and WoW are more CPU dependent than GPU dependent. are'nt the trinity APU's piledriver cores? I think they should handle cpu intensive games much better than what OP is stating. Upvote 0 Downvote
amuffin : Simply because BF3 and WoW are more CPU dependent than GPU dependent. are'nt the trinity APU's piledriver cores? I think they should handle cpu intensive games much better than what OP is stating.
N noob2222 Distinguished Nov 19, 2007 2,722 0 20,860 Jan 11, 2013 #8 They have no L3 cache, most games love l3 cache. Upvote 0 Downvote
satyamdubey Distinguished Jun 19, 2012 1,345 2 19,665 Jan 11, 2013 #9 noob2222 : They have no L3 cache, most games love l3 cache. agreed but should it take that big a hit. It's a piledriver core @ 3.2 after all. Upvote 0 Downvote
noob2222 : They have no L3 cache, most games love l3 cache. agreed but should it take that big a hit. It's a piledriver core @ 3.2 after all.
N noob2222 Distinguished Nov 19, 2007 2,722 0 20,860 Jan 11, 2013 #10 you can see the games drop by 20%+ , both pd cores at 3.8 ghz http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/700?vs=675 Upvote 0 Downvote
you can see the games drop by 20%+ , both pd cores at 3.8 ghz http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/700?vs=675
satyamdubey Distinguished Jun 19, 2012 1,345 2 19,665 Jan 11, 2013 #11 noob2222 : you can see the games drop by 20%+ , both pd cores at 3.8 ghz http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/700?vs=675 convinced with your point Upvote 0 Downvote
noob2222 : you can see the games drop by 20%+ , both pd cores at 3.8 ghz http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/700?vs=675 convinced with your point