If you are truly worried about your computer burning up, don't go with AMD. If you are unconfortable with installing a heatsink, then simply don't. FUGGER makes a valid point for those who are not very comfortable with computer hardware, but for many people, it isn't a big issue to worry about. A Pentium III 1 GHz costs about $245, while a 1.2 GHz Athlon is $232 for 266 mHz bus and $217 for 200 mHz bus. The 1.2 GHz Athlon will be a better performing chip than the Pentium III, even more so if you stick a DDR mainboard solution with it.
DDR is more expensive though, plus there is an issue of *possible* bugs in the AMD 760 DDR chipset. As I recall, they've pretty much been resolved with considering the couple month delay that it took to be released from when it was first announced. What I say you do is go with the 1.2 GHz Athlon (266 mHz bus) with a KT133A motherboard. It would be cheaper that way. You'd save a little over a Pentium III system, but would have a better performing computer because of the 20% boost in clock speed the Athlon would have over the Pentium III. If you were to go with a DDR system, you'd probably pay about $100 more and get about 10%-15% performance increase, give or take.
Or, if you wanted to save even more money, you could spend $166 on a 1 GHz Athlon and regular KT133 or KT133A motherboard, and attempt overclocking. But that could be dangerous for someone who doesn't know much about computers, so be warned and do a lot of research if you want to attempt it. You's save about $100 that way then going with an equivacably capable Pentium III system. With that, you could upgrade your video card, or whatever... Just my 2 cents.
"We put the <i>fun</i> back into fundamentalist dogma!"