K K1ash3r Distinguished May 20, 2009 587 0 18,980 Dec 17, 2012 #1 Hi guys, i have an AMD 955 running at 3.7GHZ (1.35v) and 18.5 Multiplier. When I run 3dMark11 benchmark test I get a result of 4322 Physics score(CPU), which seems very low.
Hi guys, i have an AMD 955 running at 3.7GHZ (1.35v) and 18.5 Multiplier. When I run 3dMark11 benchmark test I get a result of 4322 Physics score(CPU), which seems very low.
L lostgamer_03 Honorable Aug 4, 2012 1,820 1 12,160 Dec 17, 2012 #2 K1ash3r : Hi guys, i have an AMD 955 running at 3.7GHZ (1.35v) and 18.5 Multiplier. When I run 3dMark11 benchmark test I get a result of 4322 Physics score(CPU), which seems very low. What did you expect? It's an old and very cheap CPU. http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/gaming-cpu-review-overclock,review-32582-5.html
K1ash3r : Hi guys, i have an AMD 955 running at 3.7GHZ (1.35v) and 18.5 Multiplier. When I run 3dMark11 benchmark test I get a result of 4322 Physics score(CPU), which seems very low. What did you expect? It's an old and very cheap CPU. http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/gaming-cpu-review-overclock,review-32582-5.html
D Derza10 Dignified Sep 7, 2012 3,585 1 15,460 Dec 17, 2012 #3 Based on this you seem to be getting better than normal scores. http://community.futuremark.com/hardware/cpu/AMD+Phenom+II+X4+955/review This shows it scoring 3900 at stock so your 4322 seems about right.
Based on this you seem to be getting better than normal scores. http://community.futuremark.com/hardware/cpu/AMD+Phenom+II+X4+955/review This shows it scoring 3900 at stock so your 4322 seems about right.
K K1ash3r Distinguished May 20, 2009 587 0 18,980 Dec 17, 2012 #4 ok, thanks. I guess im living in the past.