My opinion is that it is okay but dependent on usage, for a certain class user it can be a good product but overall its what was expected. What is trite now is that Bulldozer architecture while benefiting one aspect pays the price in another which is not beyond the point of expecting miracles until after excavator comes and goes and AMD redesigns its core architecture.
Kavari's promise is strangled by its inherent Achilles heel. If I took a 4770K and fused it with the 7800 iGPU you would probably see performance almost double what they are producing now on the Bulldozer core.
My expectation of Excavator is evolutionary and not revolutionary because the limitation will be the architecture. After that I think AMD would have learned a few lessons, one is don't commit to extended architecture road-maps, AMD is in the predicament where scrapping Bulldozer will cost more than if the replacement architecture was radical. So basically AMD are committed to rolling out the evolution until excavator comes and goes. The other aspect is that trying to reinvent the wheel is not always greener, the bulldozer arch serves a purpose in some areas but overall is to overly crippled by current standard requirements. Right now I just want Excavator to come and go so I can put some expectation into something that won't be the same all over again.
Excavator will be the end of the bulldozer architecture and it will be a case of barely better than stars what is safe to say is, whatever comes after will be nothing like Bulldozer