News AMD CPUs See Less Than 10% Performance Drop From Revised Spectre-v2 Mitigations

I didn't understand a single word in the article. Did I miss something?
Intel discovered AMD's fix for mitigating Spectre flaws didn't work, so they provided a fix, AMD shipped it out, and another website, Phoronix, tested to see how much of a performance loss it causes as it's expected these mitigations will cause some performance loss.

Unless you're running a data center, any performance loss is minimal on typical user use-cases.
 
Intel discovered AMD's fix for mitigating Spectre flaws didn't work, so they provided a fix, AMD shipped it out, and another website, Phoronix, tested to see how much of a performance loss it causes as it's expected these mitigations will cause some performance loss.

Unless you're running a data center, any performance loss is minimal on typical user use-cases.
Didn't Intel see a 35% performance loss on the same mitigation?
 
Didn't Intel see a 35% performance loss on the same mitigation?
Not on the same test, in stress-ng the 5950 lost 54% performance while the 12900k only lost 5.1% in that specific one.
As is normal some tests will have a higher impact on one or the other architecture.
The 35% reduction was for the Core i7-1185G7 and osbench.

9n8WR4nZg5uXHL9W8pJ4RZ-970-80.jpg.webp

uUsRAwf6WzkKHdDWkxtJQH-1920-80.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: drivinfast247
Apr 1, 2020
1,446
1,100
7,060
The performance difference overall is -1.5%. Nothing that should concern anyone up through the HEDT segment, though it is terrible to lose performance over a security vulnerability that poses no risk. A server setup though where you're talking dozens to hundreds of CPUs, even 1.5% is a problem, even moreso if your system depends on factors which are impacted much more greatly.

embed.php
 

STbob

Distinguished
Feb 3, 2015
56
4
18,545
If you want the best performance turn them off with inspectre. It can cause issues in online FPS games. Risk of getting hacked is super low.