AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i5-4670K

NvidiaFanboy123

Honorable
Jan 9, 2014
16
0
10,510
AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i5-4670K. Which one is better ? And do they both come with integrated graphics? Do you think they can run low level games if they do?
 
Solution
Simple answer is that the Intel Core i5-4670K is better but it does cost most money.
It will run low level games on it's integrated graphics!

Here are a few benchmarks and comparison of the CPU's to help you choose which one is best.

2nuulo5.png

294pcte.png

2i8zof4.png

i2qddv.png


Hope this helps! :)
The i5 4670k is an overall better CPU but the FX 8350 is also good. The i5 has integrated graphics and the 8350 does not. You could possibly run games in lower detail at 720p (depends on the game). I used to have a amd a10 5700 with radeon 7660d integrated graphics and in terms of gaming it was pretty awful. I would recommend at least getting a radeon 7750 as a dedicated gpu, put one of those in a friends build and it completely wipes the floor with anything running off ofintegrated graphics
 
Simple answer is that the Intel Core i5-4670K is better but it does cost most money.
It will run low level games on it's integrated graphics!

Here are a few benchmarks and comparison of the CPU's to help you choose which one is best.

2nuulo5.png

294pcte.png

2i8zof4.png

i2qddv.png


Hope this helps! :)
 
Solution
They are on par in multithreaded benchmarks and the 4670k is way faster in single threaded benchmarks. The 4670k also consumes less power (and i guess it runs cooler as well).

I feel like the only advantage the 8350 has is it's price. I would go for the 4670k.

EDIT: And the integrated graphics ofcourse.. if you go with 970 chipset + 8350 you don't have integrated graphics. Which means if your graphics card goes bad you don't have integrated graphics to use instead.