kristijan.susnik :
Well maybe.The thing is I really dont want to spend 500+ euros or dollars on graphics cards.To me that is my life ruined.So much money for a plastic componet
.The reason I came on teh RX 590 is beacause it is way cheaper and still the cheaper price doesn't make it weak and because the price dropped from 420 to 340 whic is a lot cheaper than other 1060 cards....Let's say if you didn't want to spend a lot of money on graphics cards but you still wanted a good experience would you go whit the AMD RX 590 Sapphire Nitro+ edition?
And one of the more important questions for me is a 340 euro or dollar RX 590 Sapphire Nitro+ edition(so a little better than a normal one)worth the money(it aslo comes whit 3 games as I said but let the games not decide)?
Well, it really comes down to what the cost of a 580 was, but I always look at value.
Both the 580 and 590 run in the same "class" - you will get decent frame rates on most current games at 1080p. The 590 is about 10% faster, just to throw out a number, but that amount will NOT make it so that you can play a game at a different resolution than the 580 - it will just be a bit faster. The Sapphire Nitro+ is clocked 1% faster than stock, so really, won't make much of a real performance difference.
Again, I think the 580 offers better value - you will save a lot of money and you will generally be able to play the same games at the same resolutions with either GPU. Neither is going to let you game at 4k or even 1440p consistently, at least with settings up.
As for the games included, imagine you walked into a store and you saw two versions of the Nitro: One with the games for more money, and one without for cheaper. What extra money would you pay for the one with the games? If the one without the games was €330 and the one with was €340, would you go for the games? What if it was €300 and €340?
That tells you what the games are worth TO YOU.
Again, to ME, €340 is not worth it for a RX 590. It's slightly faster than an RX 580, but the RX 580 is basically an overclocked RX 480 which is nearly 3 years old now. So you are spending most of the cost of a newer GPU for something that, in the end, will let you play existing games at 1080p but which might soon be outclassed by faster GPUs from Nvidia and AMD at around the same price point.
Toms Hardware recently reported that the RTX 2060 will have a "January 15th availability date, $349 US price (~ £274), and confirmation that the card will come with 30 RT cores for ray tracing." It may be hard to get a 2060 for MSRP the day it launches, but that card should significantly outperform the 590 for about the same money once it's available for MSRP. I would think that would mean there would be good deals on other cards, including last-gen Nvidia cards like the 1080, and quite possibly would make the RX 590 and Vega GPUs from AMD cheaper.
But it seems like you really want that card! In which case, if you've got the money and you won't miss it, go for it! Not so many months ago I got a Samsung 960 because it was on a (slight) sale - but 6 months later, it would have been MUCH cheaper. But I don't regret my purchase, because it made a noticeable difference in performance and I've enjoyed it since.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram