AMD or Intel for mid-high End Gaming/Video Editing System

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

TheGamingKiwi

Reputable
Sep 20, 2014
78
0
4,630
Ok, so.
I am currently planning on building a new rig. I thought all along that yep, I will go with Intel cause they are better etc etc. But I've always had a little voice in the back of my mind going, why not AMD? After watching some youtube vids from Tech Syndicate and JayzTwoCents (who are both very unbiased, thank god), AMD is starting to seem to me not necessarily a bad choice. Jayz said that the most wasted upgrade was going from the FX-8350 to intel (I think the 3770k). Tek Syndicate has being doing some benchmarking on the 8350 and the 4690k, and yeh, there may have been 1 or 2 fps here and there but it was negligible. Also, the 8350 bet the i5 in just as many games as the i5 bet the 8350. I decided that if I went with AMD, I would go all out. I'm thinking of going with the 9590, which is 400$(including the water cooler). Now, I am mostly a gamer, BUT I would like to start a youtube channel, so would the 9590 also be good at rendering and recording? And yes, I know it's really really hot and and consumes lots of power, but I couldn't give two s***t's really. I would like some unbiased answers, and if anyone has had first hand experience with the 9590, let me know.
Cheers

BTW I'm getting a Seasonic 850 psu, which is enough to power it. Also either the 29 290 or GTX 770/780
 

TheGamingKiwi

Reputable
Sep 20, 2014
78
0
4,630
If I was to go AMD what would be better, either getting the 8350 and the h80i (=394$) and try and oc it to about 4.6-4.8 or get the 9590 and water cooler combo for $399. What would be the better deal?
 

DubbleClick

Admirable


I love the first comment:

"Running this chip at load 24/7 at 18p per kWh for a year would cost about £525 although you might be able to turn your heating down a bit. Should be consigned to history."

That's 1200€ per year in germany.
 

DubbleClick

Admirable


Both would be absolutely awful. You won't even get to performance level of a xeon e3-1231v3 but pay $110 extra and consume a lot more power and have more noise due to the cooler.

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: Intel Xeon E3-1231 V3 3.4GHz Quad-Core Processor ($242.99 @ SuperBiiz)
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-DS3H Micro ATX LGA1150 Motherboard ($41.98 @ Newegg)
Total: $284.97
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2015-06-13 05:06 EDT-0400

This has the same rendering performance and is ~40% better for single thread applications (and gaming). And it consumes about 1/4 to 1/5 of the power.
 

DubbleClick

Admirable
Yup. Good offer, except for the ram. I'd prefer this:
PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: Intel Xeon E3-1231 V3 3.4GHz Quad-Core Processor ($349.00 @ CPL Online)
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97M-D3H Micro ATX LGA1150 Motherboard ($125.00 @ IJK)
Memory: Corsair Vengeance 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3-1866 Memory ($84.00 @ CPL Online)
Total: $558.00
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2015-06-13 20:55 AEST+1000

Better board, better ram.