AMD Phenom FX CPU Expected in 2009

Status
Not open for further replies.

jj463rd

Distinguished
Apr 9, 2008
1,510
0
19,860
29
If AMD doen't match Intel's Core i7's performance then they shouldn't charge high prices for the Phenom FX processor.It would be a bad move and AMD will sell very few of them.If a 3 Ghz Phenom FX has slightly less performance than a $300 2.66 Ghz Intel Core i7 the price should match it's performance in other words it should be around the $250 price range.
 

Kari

Splendid
maybe they hope to have chips that'll be competitive on the performance side as well. Otherwise the usage of the FX suffix wouldn't really make any sense... well we'll see
 

cal8949

Distinguished
Jul 9, 2007
348
0
18,780
0
[citation][nom]jj463rd[/nom]If AMD doen't match Intel's Core i7's performance then they shouldn't charge high prices for the Phenom FX processor.It would be a bad move and AMD will sell very few of them.If a 3 Ghz Phenom FX has slightly less performance than a $300 2.66 Ghz Intel Core i7 the price should match it's performance in other words it should be around the $250 price range.[/citation]

well thats a good point but if this processor is made off of denab and if denab can oc well. the fx processor will be a hit with its unlocked multiplier. but still i think the processor should be under 350 if it is just as good as core i7
 

mackintire

Distinguished
Dec 8, 2005
20
0
18,510
0
Part of the rumor states that the Phenom FX chips will over clock between 4.0-4.4Ghz on iar while using the HT3 interconnect. If that is true then AMD could charge a premium for these chips. Keep in mind that cherry picked 65nm Phenom's from early last year could run 3.0Ghz on air with no issues. So although it sounds far fetched, there could be some truth to the rumors.
 

mackintire

Distinguished
Dec 8, 2005
20
0
18,510
0
I forgot to mention that most of the current Phenom Processors can easily clock to 3.2-3.4Ghz on the 790 chipset. Without exotic cooling.
 

onearmedscissorb

Distinguished
Apr 25, 2008
38
0
18,530
0
Engineering samples of the Denebs only overclock to about 3.6 GHz so far, at least from what I have seen. That will probably change slightly by the time they're actually for sale, but let's be realistic here. They are still the same architecture that hasn't fared too well against Core 2. Their tri-cores aren't even as good as lower end dual-core Core 2s. This isn't going to compete with Core i7, overclocked or not. Considering how long it's going to be until they come out now, I'll be surprised if it even matches 45nm Core 2s, as those have already matured at this point, and will have over a full year lead by that time.

It's probably just high binned chips with a different socket type for a new dual CPU socket desktop board. To my knowledge, that's what the Phenom FX line was intended to be to begin with, before it was delayed.
 

zenmaster

Splendid
Feb 21, 2006
3,867
0
22,790
3
AMD has watered down the term "Black Edition" so much with chips that did not really offer anything more than non "BE" chips since their stock speeds were close to max. As a result the "Unlock" did not help much.

Now it will be up to AMD to put some actual oomph behind this "FX" chip.
If not, it will just be another meaningless moniker like "BE" has.

 

Pei-chen

Distinguished
Jul 3, 2007
1,254
0
19,280
0
Ha, by summer next year I'll be building my i7 computer that's will be 30 faster per clock and has a 30% higher overclock speed. That's 90% faster for a few bucks more.
 

gto127

Distinguished
Jan 8, 2008
158
0
18,680
0
The denebs are already close to 10% faster clock per clock than previous phenom with the extra cache. If AMD puts even more level 2& 3 cache for the FX version they might give Intel a run for their money.
 

DrT

Distinguished
Aug 6, 2008
6
0
18,510
0
That sounds great. Rather like core i7. (Only we all know this fx line will be slower) and released 6 months later. I thought AMD bought ATI for a reason, GPU CPU Fusion? Instead they offer us shared L3 cache. Amazing. That is really innovative.

They need to come out with something that is faster than the oposition and they need to do it quickly. My aging Athlon 64 3000+ is feeling really slow now and and my only upgrade options are in the blue corner. Sadly i'm not the only person that realises this

http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=AMD&t=2y&l=on&z=m&q=l&c=
 

caamsa

Distinguished
Apr 25, 2006
1,830
0
19,810
13
If AMD successfully pulls this off I will be impressed. People seem to forget the AMD VS Intell is truly a David vs Goliath situation. It is disappointing that it is taking this long for AMD to strike back in the CPU department.
 

DrT

Distinguished
Aug 6, 2008
6
0
18,510
0
Shared L3 cache. Amazing. That is pure innovation. What happened to GPU CPU fusion? Someone remind me why they bought ATI again? Intel are already on a mature 45 nm fab process. AMD is a cycle behind. Q4 this year core i7 will be released and we all know it will be faster than this fx line. Every member of staff at Intel could go on holiday for 9 months and they would still be ahead of AMD. My aging AMD 64 is getting really slow now and all my upgrade options are in the blue corner. Sadly i'm not the only person who realises this check out the AMD share price over the last 2 years.

http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=AMD&t=2y&l=on&z=m&q=l&c=

 

DrT

Distinguished
Aug 6, 2008
6
0
18,510
0
oh man i'm really tired. I'm going to post this eventally.. AMD share price take 4...

http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=AMD&t=2y&l=on&z=m&q=l&c=

i'm almost as rubbish as AMD at the moment.
 

jimmysmitty

Champion
Moderator
[citation][nom]mackintire[/nom]Part of the rumor states that the Phenom FX chips will over clock between 4.0-4.4Ghz on iar while using the HT3 interconnect. If that is true then AMD could charge a premium for these chips. Keep in mind that cherry picked 65nm Phenom's from early last year could run 3.0Ghz on air with no issues. So although it sounds far fetched, there could be some truth to the rumors. [/citation]

I proved this was just BS trying to get more hits to their website. Read this thread:

http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/253181-28-phenom-deneb-core-kentsfield-beater

I looked way into it and 1. The article that was put up on the UK site was taken from a OC screen that was posted on a OCng site and 2. the OC screen from that site itself was photoshopped to make it look like it was at 4GHz when it was not true.

Current Phenoms based on Ageina can only clock to 4GHz with LN2. Deneb may be able to clock higher but in truth I don't think it will get to 4GHz stable and easily.

Core i7 has yet to be tested for gaming on a finished system with finished drivers. The only one site that tested Core i7 for gaming didn't have the drivers installed correctly for the PCIe so it wasn't fully functioning.

Also on that thread I posted a roadmap from AMD and it does show Phenom FX that will be based on the 45nm Deneb core and it will have the FX-80 @ 2.8GHz and the FX-90 @ 3GHz. Problem is we do not know how well it will OC right now and taking current Phenoms as a preface I would think not as much better.

From preliminary info though we can see that Deneb is anywhere from 7-15% faster clock per clock than Ageina Phenoms so that would put it roughly on par with Kentsfield based C2Qs and still a bit behind Yorkfield based C2Qs. Core i7 in multithreaded apps show 2-30% gain in performance clock per clock over Yorkfield and single threaded apps is about 10-15%.
 

martel80

Distinguished
Dec 8, 2006
368
0
18,780
0
[citation][nom]Pei-chen[/nom]Ha, by summer next year I'll be building my i7 computer that's will be 30 faster per clock and has a 30% higher overclock speed. That's 90% faster for a few bucks more.[/citation]
[citation][nom]kami3k[/nom]Amazing how 30+30=60 to pei-chen. Also a overclock doesn't mean it will still be as good a non-overclocked CPU with that same speed.[/citation]
1.3 * 1.3 = 1.69 so your theoretical speed advantage is 69 per-cent. :)
 

Pei-chen

Distinguished
Jul 3, 2007
1,254
0
19,280
0
[citation][nom]kami3k[/nom]Amazing how 30+30=60 to pei-chen. Also a overclock doesn't mean it will still be as good a non-overclocked CPU with that same speed.[/citation]
Read martel80's comment above to learn basic math. I hope one day you’ll be working for ESA.

[citation][nom]martel80[/nom]
1.3 * 1.3 = 1.69 so your theoretical speed advantage is 69 per-cent.[/citation]
Yep, I just estimated it without actually calculating it. Thanks for calculating it for me.
 

warezme

Distinguished
Dec 18, 2006
2,405
27
19,840
20
Don't see how an FX phenom will help AMD?? Clock/clock a Yorkfield is already faster than a Phenom and a QX9770 already hits 4Ghz easily. I don't see an FX XX or whatever getting anywhere near that speed, let alone a Nehalem.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS