AMD's RX 6900XT smashes another world record at 3.3 GHz.
AMD RX 6900XT Screams at 3.3 GHz, Breaking Another World Record : Read more
AMD RX 6900XT Screams at 3.3 GHz, Breaking Another World Record : Read more
The scheduled forum maintenance has now been completed. If you spot any issues, please report them here in this thread. Thank you!
Yeah I think you're on wrong track with that level of thinking as they're completely different architectures for a start.That doesn't bode well for AMD. Nvidia is beating them using an inferior process...
Also using substantially more resources to accomplish it.That doesn't bode well for AMD. Nvidia is beating them using an inferior process...
That doesn't bode well for AMD. Nvidia is beating them using an inferior process...
and if none of the games a person currently plays, doesnt use RT, or the card can handle the res and graphics options just fine at native rez of the screen the person is using, those " 2 major features " become moot.Well, nvidia has 2 major features, 1 is DLSS, another is ray tracing
Only in sale numbers it beats them, take a look at newer benchmarks, not those from launch and you can see dozens of games where AMD beats nvidia even by a big margin.That doesn't bode well for AMD. Nvidia is beating them using an inferior process...
Where do you even find this information, even I've heard there are about 40+ games supporting FidelityFX - not that I'd knowingly use it even I had a game with it.Right now, no games seems to support fideltyfx....
He means FidelitFX Super Resolution, which is obviously different from FidelityFX in general, as well as from the majority that support either FidelityFX CAS (Contrast Aware Sharpening) or FidelityFX AO (yeah, there's a special variant of Ambient Occlusion for FidelityFX now, I'm not sure how different it is from the other forms of AO though). Right now, FSR has not been officially launched or used in any games.Where do you even find this information, even I've heard there are about 40+ games supporting FidelityFX - not that I'd knowingly use it even I had a game with it.
You're not making a rational judgement if you're saying anyone that disagrees with you is a liar.I do not really care if RX 6900 XT can run on 3,3 Ghz or a Trillion Ghz. I own a 3080 payed 700 bucks for it, and ray tracing is, drop dead gorgeous. Once you have seen it, you want it, everyone who says otherwise is a liar. I know AMD fellowship has become a religion, but I have bad news for you. While real religion at least promises you some salvation in the afterlife, AMD or NVIDIA worshiping promises you only a dent in your wallet. I find far less Isis level NVIDIA fanboys that AMD ones. Fun fact, I own a Ryzen 3900 CPU, yet I can still make rational judgements. Why can´t you?
It makes no sense to say this as everyone knows that FSR is not released yet.He means FidelitFX Super Resolution...
Overclocker Der8auer, in a video showcasing his 3.2GHz 6900XT overclock, mentioned AMD’s use of an artificial clock limiter on most of the AIB partner cards and reference cards, which limits the cards to around 3 GHz.
I actually find it funny that that is what everyone seems to be saying now, when all I heard was "this summer". If it launches in June, it would probably be late June at best. You would normally expect such an important feature to be launched alongside a new GPU, but that doesn't seem to be set to happen very soon.As for the lack of DLSS, well DSR, it's coming next month - quite a few leakers already said so...