AMD Ryzen 9 9950X vs Intel Core i9-14900K Faceoff

phxrider

Distinguished
Oct 10, 2013
85
44
18,570
I'd still buy the AMD if only due to the power usage and heat output of the Intel, if I was building a new PC. (Actually, I'd wait for the X3D version, but I already have a 7950X3D and don't see the need to upgrade unless they really surprise me with something big and totally unexpected with the 9950X3D.)

And AFAIK, no one who can afford high-end gaming systems with a $600 CPU and $700+ in the GPU plays at 1080. It's a benchmark for benchmarking's sake - IMO not anything anyone should worry about in the real world.
 

Moobear

Reputable
Dec 9, 2019
8
1
4,510
No mention at all of 13th and 14th gen instability issues and silicon degradation. That should be worth at least a point or more toward aggregate scores.
Yeah unbelievable that they give Intel a win with al the issues they are having and potentially advise people buying faulty chips after reading this article.
 
  • Like
Reactions: phxrider

Gururu

Upstanding
Jan 4, 2024
285
181
370
The 14900 remains a strong chip even against Intel's new offerings. If the fixes hold up, it may have a long life with enthusiasts over the next few years.
 

TheHerald

Notable
Feb 15, 2024
1,384
401
1,060
How did you measure power draw? What kind of limits where in place? Ycruncher only limited to 220w on the 14900k seems off to me. It should be much higher
 

logainofhades

Titan
Moderator
Cool. What percent of the market are they?

I'm guessing that niche would want a 7800X3D anyway.

Your claim was no one. 1080p can still be quite demanding, especially for those that want to go all in on RT.

RT_1080p-p.webp


Ultra settings in starfield also could be demanding even at 1080p.

Ultra-1080p-p.webp