Ok, please inform me if I am incorrect but this is information I have picked up over the internet and throug company employees.
Battle One: Price
- AMD is raising prices to increase demand.
- Intel will be lowering prices on non-hyper thearding CPUs to increase demand in HT.
Battle Two: Heat
- AMDs are much hotter than Intel, therefore making Intel more effienct in a Mhz to Heat Ratio.
Battle Three: Extras
- AMD has been slowly increasing processor capacity and FSB while Intel has added Hyper-Threading, 800Mhz FSB (200x4), and is nearly 1000 Mhz faster than the nearest Athlon.
Now from this, I would be most inclined to buy an Intel in a couple months, say a 3.0Ghz w/ 800 FSB w/o HT when prices drop rather than and Athlon 3000. So I'm wondering, why is everyone so hung up on Athlons? They used to be great because they were cheaper than Intel, and in some respect they were faster. But jumping into the Intel price range is really going to make sales decline and I think most consumers will defintly go Intel at that point.
Battle One: Price
- AMD is raising prices to increase demand.
- Intel will be lowering prices on non-hyper thearding CPUs to increase demand in HT.
Battle Two: Heat
- AMDs are much hotter than Intel, therefore making Intel more effienct in a Mhz to Heat Ratio.
Battle Three: Extras
- AMD has been slowly increasing processor capacity and FSB while Intel has added Hyper-Threading, 800Mhz FSB (200x4), and is nearly 1000 Mhz faster than the nearest Athlon.
Now from this, I would be most inclined to buy an Intel in a couple months, say a 3.0Ghz w/ 800 FSB w/o HT when prices drop rather than and Athlon 3000. So I'm wondering, why is everyone so hung up on Athlons? They used to be great because they were cheaper than Intel, and in some respect they were faster. But jumping into the Intel price range is really going to make sales decline and I think most consumers will defintly go Intel at that point.