Amdfx8350 vs Intel

[Rahul Rajput CR]

hello guys,I know that intel cpu's are better then amd.
But in future,if any game uses all cores of Amdfx8350 or take advantage of its 8cores then what.
Plssss guys reply.

 

[SkyBill40]

AMD CPUs are just fine by comparison. I have an 8350 and couldn't be happier. It get great performance and didn't have to overspend to get it.

 

[barel0702500]

Please specify ur Intel processor first, secondly More cores doesn't it's better more performance means it's better Intel quad core processes are better than AMD octa core more no. of men not equals to greater result it's depends on their efficiency too.
Moreover AMD processors consume more power generate more heat

 

[Rahul Rajput CR]

But if any game uses its all core then.Is it can outerperform any i5

 

[barel0702500]

If 4 core can do the job easily (which it do definitely) then what's problem
Please don't consider more core are better check it http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i5-4690-vs-AMD-FX-8350.

 

[SkyBill40]

Few games are programmed to use multiple cores and NONE are set to use more than four at this point. AMDs perform well in multi core programs but do lag behind in single threaded applications to Intel. Each side has their specific strong suits.

AMD's chips tend to use more power and generate more heat, but to rule them out because of that would be ridiculous. Any perceived cost savings is largely irrelevant seeing as it would take you decades to see any differences. There have been several tests done with cost figures and it's all shown the argument to be moot.

Intel makes good stuff, no doubt. You're certainly going to pay more for it though, so bear that in mind. The prices have been coming down on the more mainstream enthusiast stuff, so that's a plus. I guess it's all on what you expect from it and how much you're willing to spend to get it. I've had three AMD based rigs now and enjoyed each and every one of them. To each their own.

 

[holyrage]

Intel Quad Cores from sandy bride and up will beat an AMD FX running Stock Speed actually they come out the same price wise

if u buy an FX8350 u need to get a cooling solution that will OC it to 4.6~+GHZ so u dont end up bottlenecking

with a intel Quad core from sandy bride and up u can run that thing at stock clocks are still not bottleneck or get a 212 EVO and that will suffice for overclocking

IMO if u can afford a I5 than go with intel if u cant go with AMD FX and get a 212 EVO and Oc it

if u dont want to Overclock just go with intel i have seen FX CPUs getting Oc'ed and the performance gains were good

 

[Rahul Rajput CR]

I know intel is better.But if any game take advantage of 8cores.

 

[bignastyid]

We are more than likely still a few years away from seeing games that use 8 cpu cores. By then the 8350 will be antiquated and even with 8 cores it probably wont run them very well. Take some of the first quad cores for example. Now that same games can use 4 cores the early quad cores(intel and amd both) can barely run them.

 

[barel0702500]

Why don't u check http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i5-4690-vs-AMD-FX-8350 which shows all AMD 8 cores roughly performs same as I5 4 cores.
here comes tie
Next more single core performance from i5 give u better experience than AMD if games use 4 core h
here Intel wins

 

[holyrage]

well check these benchmarks

http://www.techspot.com/review/827-watch-dogs-benchmarks/page5.html as u can see Ocing the FX to 4.5GHZ it cought up to the I7

and here is far cry 4 http://www.techspot.com/review/917-far-cry-4-benchmarks/page5.html even tho it is a mutlithreaded game the Intel still does better coz the game was better optimized for Single core performance so it depends

even in well CPU optimized games the I5 still gets the job done so like i said if u can afford it go with the I5.

better stay with a safe consistent Performance imo

also DX12 Games are spouse to use Less CPU Power kinda of like Mantle so the situation will must likely be GPU Bound by then