News AMD's 128-core EPYC CPU becomes the multi-threaded performance champ in CPU-Z — EPYC 9755 Turin chip scores over 108,000 points

[Admin]

AMD's 128-core EPYC 9755 'Turin' processor with Zen 5 cores is 57% faster than the 128-core EPYC 9754 processor with Zen 4c cores in CPU-Z multi-thread benchmark, says Leaker.

AMD's 128-core EPYC CPU becomes the multi-threaded performance champ in CPU-Z — EPYC 9755 Turin chip scores over 108,000 points : Read more

 

[CerianK]

Table lists 7955WX instead of 7995WX:

Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7955WX

Zen 4 | 96C/192T

62,620

 

[FunSurfer]

It will be interesting to see the gaming performance of this CPU, to understand how much the fps gain for 512MB of L3 cache will be compared to 96MB, as single-thread performance is close to the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

 

[helper800]

It will be interesting to see the gaming performance of this CPU, to understand how much the fps gain for 512MB of L3 cache will be compared to 96MB, as single-thread performance is close to the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

All of that cache is split up for every core though, no? The thing about the extra cache for the X3D chips is that most of it is available to every core (1 chiplet X3Ds) much more readily then when its split up like in these massive CPUs.

 

[phitinh81]

All of that cache is split up for every core though, no? The thing about the extra cache for the X3D chips is that most of it is available to every core (1 chiplet X3Ds) much more readily then when its split up like in these massive CPUs.

It will be interesting to see the gaming performance of this CPU, to understand how much the fps gain for 512MB of L3 cache will be compared to 96MB, as single-thread performance is close to the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

V Cache stacks L3 on top of CPU die, all of it so direct access. On EPYC, no matter how big L3 is, its not close enough to the cores to make any difference in gaming.

 

[DanCar]

I wonder how many tokens per second (1.5?) we will get when using llama 400 with this.